CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 8 décembre 2016

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sD231494E { font-size:6.67pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC215C3BC { color:#0069d6 } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s5A722CD { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s7FF5B588 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:70pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-70pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .sB2A0F2B6 { font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } Resolution CM/ResDH(2016)359 Execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights 34 cases against Poland (See the annex for the list of cases)   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 8 December 2016 at the 1273 rd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter “the Convention”),   Having regard to the final judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established due to excessive length of administrative proceedings;   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having examined the information provided by the government (see document DH-DD(2016)1160 );   Having noted that just satisfaction awarded by the Court has been paid by the government of the respondent State and that domestic proceedings in these cases are now terminated;   Having noted the general measures adopted by the Polish authorities, which demonstrate their commitment to continue the efforts to solve the problem of the excessive length of administrative proceedings;   Noting with satisfaction that the amendments to the Law on proceedings before administrative courts which entered into force in August 2015 have allowed for termination of the practice of remittals of cases after annulment of administrative decisions, a reason for numerous delays in the proceedings;   Noting that outstanding issues concerning the length of administrative proceedings and the functioning of the remedies remain under supervision in the framework of the Beller group of cases;   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in the cases enlisted below and   DECIDES to close the examination thereof.     Appendix   Application   Case Judgment of Final on 33870/96 FUCHS 11/02/2003 11/05/2003 28940/08 ANDRZEJCZAK 22/01/2013 22/01/2013 15629/02 BARTCZAK 04/11/2008 04/02/2009 22305/06 BŁASZCZYK 08/01/2008 08/04/2008 4054/03 BOSZKO 05/12/2006 05/03/2007 19171/03 CHMIELECKA 16/12/2008 16/03/2009 26764/08 GAWLIK 11/10/2011 11/10/2011 1730/08 GLOWACKA AND KROLICKA 07/12/2010 07/12/2010 21246/05 GRACZYK 04/11/2008 04/02/2009 33550/02 HELWIG 21/10/2008 06/04/2009 62506/00 KAMECKI AND OTHERS 09/06/2009 09/09/2009 12605/03 KANIA LEON AND AGNIESZKA 21/07/2009 21/10/2009 27710/05 KITA LIDIA 22/07/2008 22/10/2008 43161/04 KLEWINOWSKI 09/12/2008 06/04/2009 11522/03 KLIBER 13/01/2009 13/04/2009 42797/06 KOSINSKA 14/12/2010 14/03/2011 11700/04 KRZEWSKI 02/12/2008 06/04/2009 13024/05 OLSZEWSKA 18/12/2007 18/03/2008 7153/07 ORLIKOWSCY 04/10/2011 04/01/2012 77741/01 PIEKARA 15/06/2004 15/09/2004 8362/02 PIÓRO AND ŁUKASIK 02/12/2008 05/06/2009 23759/02 PRZEPAŁKOWSKI 22/07/2008 01/12/2008 10392/04 PUCHALSKA 06/10/2009 01/03/2010 36980/04 SERAFIN AND OTHERS 21/04/2009 21/07/2009 51123/07 SERAFIN AND OTHERS No. 2 02/12/2008 02/03/2009 19607/03 SITO 09/01/2007 09/04/2007 13568/02 STEVENS 24/10/2006 24/01/2007 9399/03 TOMASZEWSKA 14/04/2009 14/07/2009 33777/96 URBAŃCZYK 01/06/2004 01/09/2004 12134/02 URBAŃSKA 13/11/2007 13/02/2008 17949/03 WESOŁOWSKA 04/03/2008 04/06/2008 28983/02 WILCZKOWSKA AND OTHERS 08/01/2008 08/04/2008 33017/03 WÓJCICKA-SURÓWKA 27/11/2007 27/02/2008 35965/03 ZJEDNOCZONE BROWARY WARSZAWSKIE HABERBUSCH I SCHIELE S.A. 14/12/2010 14/12/2010