CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 21 septembre 2016

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2007D3CB { width:100%; border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s69377004 { width:22.52%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .sA35AE1FC { width:42.14%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sD2129E4A { width:16.74%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s83FAFE84 { width:18.6%; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF29177A6 { height:1pt } .s1B118291 { width:22.52%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5F67EB6D { width:42.14%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2F0D1EF5 { width:16.74%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s7D439F77 { width:18.6%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sED277E21 { width:22.52%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sA820AD48 { width:42.14%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sE22D8E1E { width:16.74%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s3ACAC4E3 { width:18.6%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sD231494E { font-size:6.67pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s9D083258 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:56.7pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-21.25pt } .sA40F326F { width:17.92pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s5A722CD { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s899A4987 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt; widows:0; orphans:0 } Final Resolution CM/ResDH(2016)272 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Four cases against Albania   Application Case Judgment of Final on 12315/04 LASKA AND LIKA 20/04/2010 20/07/2010 33192/07+ KAÇIU AND KOTORRI 25/06/2013 09/12/2013 847/05 BERHANI 27/05/2010 04/10/2010 26866/05 SHKALLA 10/05/2011 10/08/2011   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 21 September 2016 at the 1265 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations of Article 6, paragraph 1 and 3 and of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the unfairness and excessive length of criminal proceedings, and ill-treatment during interrogation by the police;   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -   of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -   of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having noted that the just satisfaction has been paid by the government of the respondent State and that the impugned proceedings at issue in these cases were reopened;   Noting with satisfaction the numerous amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure defining principles concerning the identification of suspects, access to a lawyer from the first moment of arrest or detention, the rights of the accused during interrogation and the prohibition of the use of statements obtained in violation of these rights, as well as general measures adopted to prevent ill-treatment of detainees;   Noting also with satisfaction the wide-ranging awareness measures adopted to ensure that the relevant legal provisions are properly implemented in practice, including as regards the access to the Constitutional Court, in line with the requirements of Articles 3 and 6 of the Convention;   Noting finally that the general measures required in response to the other aspects of the violations of Article 6 the Convention established in some of these cases, namely concerning criminal proceedings in absentia , appearance of witnesses and excessive length of proceedings, continue to be examined in the Caka group of cases and in the Luli group,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in the cases listed above and   DECIDES to close the examination thereof.