CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 7 septembre 2016

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .sA8776625 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.6pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s72C8F48C { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:36.6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:-15.05pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sF7A86111 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:7.1pt; font-size:10pt } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s97D39FA { width:5.12pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s944BDE53 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:36pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s25B97BCD { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border:0.75pt solid #808080; border-collapse:collapse } .sF5C9E8B1 { height:46.3pt } .sD1CDDC62 { border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e0e0e0 } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .s2490CDBC { border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e0e0e0 } .s8DB21C27 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .s3B53EBD5 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; font-size:8pt } .s26ADB50A { border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e0e0e0 } .sB217F55D { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:8pt } .sFD306575 { height:35.55pt } .s2F4AF114 { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s6CF83D49 { margin-left:11.67pt; padding-left:6.18pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold } .s898DAE93 { border:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sA0B2759 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:0.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-0.45pt; text-align:justify; font-size:8pt } .sB71F2881 { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sFD82DC6 { margin-left:16.12pt; padding-left:1.73pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold } .sBCA334AF { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s7CB6920E { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s62945D10 { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } Communicated on 7 September 2016   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 3927/15 Nahida ČALUK against Bosnia and Herzegovina and 72 other applications (see list appended) The applicants are citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Their personal details are set out in the appended table. A.     The circumstances of the cases The facts of the cases, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. By 75 judgments of the Travnik Municipal Court and the Bugojno Municipal Court, the applicants’ employers, various public companies, were ordered to pay the applicants different sums in respect of unpaid work-related benefits together with default interest at the statutory rate and legal costs. The judgments became final between 19 December 2003 and 27   December 2012. Since the public companies are financed from the budget of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (one of the two constituent entities in Bosnia and Herzegovina), the judgments were to be enforced from the federal budget. The Sarajevo Municipal Court issued writs of execution between 10 October 2011 and 27 February 2013, in which the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina was designated as a debtor. They were transferred to the competent bank and were listed among the charges in the federal budget. On several occasions thereafter the bank informed the competent courts that the enforcement was not possible because the budgetary funds intended for that purpose had already been spent. The final judgments in the applicants’ favour remain unenforced until the present day. B.     Relevant domestic law and practice 1. Enforcement Procedure Act 2003 of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina Section 138 of the Enforcement Procedure Act 2003 ( Zakon o izvršnom postupku , Official Gazette of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina nos. 32/03, 52/03, 33/06, 39/06 and 39/09) provides for the limitation of enforcement of final judgments against the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the cantons: these will be enforced only within the amount of funds provided for that purpose in the federal and cantonal budgets which cannot be lower than 5% of the total budget and must be designated annually (section 138 (3)). The enforcement will be carried out in a chronological order according to the time the judgments became final. The statutory prescription period does not apply to these claims (section 138   (6)). 2. The case-law of the Constitutional Court On 27 May 2011, in two cases similar to the present ones, the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina (“the Constitutional Court”) found a violation of Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention on account of the prolonged non-enforcement of final judgments from the federal budget (decision no. AP   1544/08). It ordered the government of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina to take the necessary steps in order to secure the payment of its debt arising from the final judgments within a reasonable time. The relevant part of the decision reads as follows: “50. ...The court notes that the judgments [in favour of the appellants] have not been enforced due to the lack of funds on the debtor’s bank account. ... 58. The Constitutional Court reiterates that under the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Article 1 of the European Convention all levels of government must secure respect for individual human rights, including the right to enforcement of final judgments under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and the right to property under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention... The scope of that obligation is not reduced in the present case, notwithstanding the large number of judgments... [T]he Constitutional Court notes that in Jeličić v. BiH, and again in Čolić and Others v. BiH , the European Court of Human Rights reiterated that ‘it is not open to a State authority to cite lack of funds as an excuse for not honouring a judgment debt. Admittedly, a delay in the execution of a judgment may be justified in particular circumstances, but the delay may not be such as to impair the essence of the right protected under Article   6 § 1’... 59. The Constitutional Court agrees with the position taken by the European Court...it is nevertheless aware of the effects the global economic crisis had on Bosnia and Herzegovina...The court notes that the federal government had taken certain steps with a view to enforcement of final court decisions. Section 138 of the Federal Enforcement Procedure Act 2003 provides that the final judgments against the Federation and the cantons shall be enforced within the amount of budgetary funds designated for that purpose...and that the creditors shall enforce their claims in the order in which they acquired the enforcement titles...In 2009 and 2010 the amount of funds for that purpose in the federal budget was BAM 6,262,001 and BAM 12,300.000, respectively. ... 61. The crux of the problem in the present case is that the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina did not identify the exact number of unenforced judgments and the aggregate debt...without which it is impossible to know when all the creditors will realise their claims. Furthermore, there should exist a centralised and transparent database of all the claims listed in chronological order according to the time the judgments became final. It should include the enforcement time-frame and a list of partial payments, if any. This will also help to avoid abuses of the enforcement procedure. These measure and adequate funds in the annual budget would ensure that all the final judgments are enforced within a reasonable time...and the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina would ensure the respect of its obligations from Article 6 §1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention. ... 63. The court considers that the adoption of section 138 of the Enforcement Procedure Act 2003 had a legitimate aim, because the enforcement of a large number of judgments at the same time would jeopardise the normal functioning of the Federation and the cantons. However, the limitation of the enforcement in the present case is contrary to the principle of proportionality enshrined in Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 which requires that a fair balance is struck between the demands of the general interest of the community and the requirements of the protection of the individual’s fundamental rights...Section 138 places a disproportionate burden on the appellants...they are placed in a situation of absolute uncertainty as regards the enforcement of their claims... 64. In order to comply with its positive obligation, the government of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina must, as explained above, calculate the total amount of the aggregate debt arising from the final judgments and prepare a comprehensive and transparent database...This court will not specify what a reasonable time-limit should be...but, in any event, it must be in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention. 65. ...The current situation does not give any guarantees to the appellants that their claims will be enforced within a reasonable time”. Subsequently, the Constitutional Court adopted two more decisions on the same matter: AP 2986/12 of 12 June 2013 and AP 3765/13 of 25 June 2014. None of these decisions has been enforced. COMPLAINT The applicants complain under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1   of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the failure by the national authorities to enforce final court decisions in their favour. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.       (a)   Could an appeal to the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina be considered an effective domestic remedy in respect of the applicants’ Convention complaints within the meaning of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention? (b) If so, has this remedy been exhausted by the applicants?   2.     Has there been a violation of Article 6 of the Convention and/or Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention arising from the failure to enforce final and enforceable judgments in the applicants’ favour (see Jeličić v. Bosnia and Herzegovina , no.   41183/02, ECHR 2006 ‑ XII, and Čolić and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina , nos. 1218/07 et al ., 10   November 2009)?   APPENDIX No. Application no. Lodged on Applicant name date of birth place of residence Represented by Final domestic decision(s) - the seat of the relevant court and the date of decision(s) Decision(s) became final The   date   of writ(s)   of execution   3927/15 15/12/2014 Nahida ČALUK 07/10/1959 Bugojno   Adil LOZO Bugojno Municipal Court   31/05/2006   31/05/2006   6/11/2012   4783/15 13/01/2015 Enes KRNJIĆ 25/11/1957 Novi Travnik   Hatidža KAPETAN Travnik Municipal Court   21/04/2011 12/10/2011 13/04/2012   4795/15 13/01/2015 Ibrahim SILAJDŽIJA 29/08/1949 Novi Travnik   Hatidža KAPETAN Travnik Municipal Court   21/04/2011 12/10/2011 17/04/2012   4799/15 13/01/2015 Ismet RIZVIĆ 09/05/1962 Novi Travnik   Hatidža KAPETAN Travnik Municipal Court 21/04/2011 12/10/2011 13/04/2012   4815/15 13/01/2015 Namik DUŽAN 27/02/1958 Novi Travnik   Hatidža KAPETAN Travnik Municipal Court 21/04/2011 12/10/2011 12/04/2012   4817/15 13/01/2015 Muhamed KERIĆ 10/02/1954 Travnik   Hatidža KAPETAN Travnik Municipal Court 21/04/2011 12/10/2011 23/04/2012   4819/15 13/01/2015 Ibrahim DELIĆ 07/02/1953 Novi Travnik   Hatidža KAPETAN Travnik Municipal Court 21/04/2011 12/10/2011 25/09/2012   4821/15 13/01/2015 Adnan ZOLOTA 12/06/1963 Novi Travnik   Hatidža KAPETAN Travnik Municipal Court 21/04/2011 12/10/2011 13/04/2012   4824/15 13/01/2015 Kasim ŠILJAK 26/09/1964 Novi Travnik   Hatidža KAPETAN Travnik Municipal Court 21/04/2011 12/10/2011 13/04/2012   4826/15 13/01/2015 Edhem SILAJDŽIJA 03/03/1951 Novi Travnik   Hatidža KAPETAN Travnik Municipal Court 21/04/2011 12/10/2011 12/04/2012   4829/15 13/01/2015 Fikret ZAHIROVIĆ 28/05/1958 Novi Travnik   Hatidža KAPETAN Travnik Municipal Court 21/04/2011 12/10/2011 24/04/2012   4833/15 13/01/2015 Nesib SKOPLJAK 13/03/1961 Novi Travnik   Hatidža KAPETAN Travnik Municipal Court 12/03/2012 27/12/2012 27/02/2013   4837/15 13/01/2015 Began HASKIĆ 26/07/1951 Novi Travnik   Hatidža KAPETAN Travnik Municipal Court 21/04/2011 12/10/2011 24/04/2012   4841/15 13/01/2015 Vejsil ĐULIĆ 15/02/1951 Novi Travnik   Hatidža KAPETAN Travnik Municipal Court 21/04/2011 12/10/2011 29/05/2012   4842/15 13/01/2015 Reflik ČAKIĆ 19/08/1963 Novi Travnik   Hatidža KAPETAN Travnik Municipal Court 21/04/2011 12/10/2011 13/04/2012   4848/15 13/01/2015 Sead HASANOVIĆ 08/02/1960 Novi Travnik   Hatidža KAPETAN Travnik Municipal Court 21/04/2011 12/10/2011 12/04/2012   4850/15 13/01/2015 Zajim KMETAŠ 10/04/1957 Novi Travnik   Hatidža KAPETAN Travnik Municipal Court 12/07/2006 20/12/2006 10/10/2011   4853/15 13/01/2015 Hatidža POKVIĆ 06/08/1963 Novi Travnik   Hatidža KAPETAN Travnik Municipal Court 21/04/2011 12/10/2011 18/04/2012   4861/15 13/01/2015 Meho ZUKIĆ 14/08/1968 Novi Travnik   Hatidža KAPETAN Travnik Municipal Court 21/04/2011 12/10/2011 13/04/2012   4951/15 13/01/2015 Suvad HODŽIĆ 20/12/1960 Novi Travnik   Hatidža KAPETAN Travnik Municipal Court 21/04/2011 12/10/2011 28/05/2012   4952/15 13/01/2015 Đemal KRNJIĆ 23/02/1962 Novi Travnik   Hatidža KAPETAN Travnik Municipal Court 21/04/2011 12/10/2011 13/04/2012   4954/15 13/01/2015 Mujo ZAHIROVIĆ 17/02/1968 Novi Travnik   Hatidža KAPETAN Travnik Municipal Court 19/01/2007 28/08/2007 09/11/2011   4957/15 13/01/2015 Sabahudin HELDA 10/10/1958 Novi Travnik   Hatidža KAPETAN Travnik Municipal Court 21/04/2011 12/10/2011 29/05/2012   5817/15 21/01/2015 Miljenka GRIZIĆ 22/06/1957 Novi Travnik   Hatidža KAPETAN Travnik Municipal Court 21/04/2011 12/10/2011 13/04/2012   7277/15 30/01/2015 Asim NURKIĆ 04/09/1958 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 07/07/2009 29/07/2009 11/06/2012   7290/15 30/01/2015 Senad HARAČIĆ 29/04/1957 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 22/02/2008 28/03/2008 17/02/2012   7294/15 30/01/2015 Nedžvija MANDARA Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 15/05/2008 15/05/2008 21/02/2012   7299/15 30/01/2015 Muradif ĆOSIĆ 29/06/1963 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 14/10/2009 02/11/2009 20/06/2012   7305/15 30/01/2015 Mirsada RUSTEMPAŠIĆ 02/11/1951 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 22/03/2005 24/05/2005 01/11/2012   7308/15 30/01/2015 Ismet MALKOČ 17/11/1954 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 17/06/2004 22/12/2004 02/07/2012   7311/15 30/01/2015 Miralem MUSTAJBEGOVIĆ 22/03/1966 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 19/01/2006 19/01/2006 17/04/2012   7323/15 29/01/2015 Sejad ČORBEG 15/09/1951 Novi Travnik   Hatidža KAPETAN Travnik Municipal Court 21/04/2011 12/10/2011 25/04/2012   7333/15 29/01/2015 Suvad ZAIMOVIĆ 15/04/1964 Novi Travnik   Hatidža KAPETAN Travnik Municipal Court 21/04/2011 12/10/2011 12/04/2012   7356/15 30/01/2015 Nihad HRNJICA 20/05/1962 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 28/10/2011 26/11/2011 25/04/2012   7357/15 30/01/2015 Lutvo ĆATIĆ 27/08/1954 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 01/07/2008 08/08/2008 29/05/2012   7416/15 30/01/2015 Dervo KARAŠIN 31/10/1963 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 21/06/2006 22/07/2006 29/05/2012   7419/15 30/01/2015 Zijad DŽUGUM 20/01/1959 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 02/02/2009 20/08/2009 05/07/2012   7422/15 30/01/2015 Haseda ŠKANDRO 11/11/1962 Donji Vakuf   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 24/12/2009 24/12/2009 11/10/2012   7425/15 30/01/2015 Senija BRZIKA 30/01/1965 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 23/01/2007 23/01/2007 21/02/2012   7434/15 30/01/2015 Đevada HODŽIĆ 18/08/1955 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 01/09/2009 13/10/2009 27/03/2012   7437/15 30/01/2015 Muhamed DAGOJA 18/04/1965 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 30/03/2011 25/04/2011 25/05/2012   7440/15 30/01/2015 Aiša TALIĆ 13/02/1951 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 10/09/2008 17/10/2008 29/05/2012   7451/15 30/01/2015 Bahrudin ĆATIĆ 14/06/1966 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 26/03/2008 31/03/2008 20/02/2012   7488/15 30/01/2015 Asim NURKIĆ 04/09/1958 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 22/04/2011 23/05/2011 25/04/2012   10020/15 05/02/2015 Safet ALIBEGOVIĆ 13/04/1956 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 22/10/2007 29/09/2011 14/11/2007 22/10/2011 04/04/2012 28/08/2012   10035/15 05/02/2015 Hanka DURADBEGOVIĆ 18/08/1957 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 28/01/2009 06/01/2010 28/02/2009 06/01/2010 20/06/2012 17/02/2012   10758/15 23/02/2015 Fadil PANDŽO 09/01/1954 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 09/04/2004 13/04/2004 09/08/2012   10765/15 23/02/2015 Mirsad MUSIĆ 01/09/1965 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 11/04/2007 09/05/2007 30/03/2012   10775/15 23/02/2015 Rasma KULAS 18/01/1960 Donji Vakuf   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 14/07/2003 22/12/2004 06/09/2012   10866/15 23/02/2015 Ramiza ĆESO 01/02/1965 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 17/06/2004 21/12/2004 09/08/2012   10869/15 23/02/2015 Sadija BRČIĆ 21/03/1966 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 25/04/2003 19/12/2003 18/04/2012   10872/15 23/02/2015 Sead GURIĆ 05/09/1960 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 17/06/2004 26/05/2004 08/06/2012   10873/15 23/02/2015 Nurudin JUSIĆ 21/10/1948 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 16/02/2009 11/06/2009 25/05/2012   10877/15 23/02/2015 Enesa PURIVATRA 03/03/1960 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 16/10/2003   27/09/2004 09/08/2012   10880/15 23/02/2015 Sulejman SULTANOVIĆ 30/12/1966 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 21/02/2010 29/04/2010 22/08/2012   10886/15 23/02/2015 Nedžad LAKAČA 14/01/1963 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 23/05/2006 17/06/2006 22/08/2012   10890/15 23/02/2015 Nedžad MANDARA 27/01/1968 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 02/02/2009 23/11/2009 09/08/2012   10895/15 23/02/2015 Nermina TATARAGA 02/03/1971 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 16/10/2003 13/05/2004 21/05/2012   10900/15 23/02/2015 Nurudin JUSIĆ 21/10/1948 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 16/08/2006 26/09/2006 04/04/2012   10906/15 23/02/2015 Safeta HAJDAREVIĆ 25/10/1957 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 13/10/2003 29/12/2004 06/09/2012   10912/15 23/02/2015 Sabahudin MISTRIĆ 19/10/1964 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 09/04/2004 30/09/2004 25/05/2012   10916/15 23/02/2015 Mujesira HUSIĆ 10/07/1961 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 01/06/2009 23/06/2009 09/08/2012   11038/15 23/02/2015 Nadžid KOSTEROVIĆ 28/12/1963 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 26/11/2004 21/09/2005 09/05/2012   11039/15 23/02/2015 Hašim SADIKOVIĆ 02/06/1966 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 20/08/2008 20/09/2009 09/08/2012   11062/15 23/02/2015 Fatima KIŠIJA 03/05/1964 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 26/01/2012 15/02/2012 02/04/2012   11068/15 23/02/2015 Mirsad BATIĆ 02/01/1958 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 17/06/2004 27/10/2004 13/04/2012   11133/15 23/02/2015 Azim VUGDALIĆ 05/01/1961 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 16/11/2011 07/12/2011 24/04/2012   11143/15 23/02/2015 Emir BRČIĆ 31/12/1964 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 19/04/2007 19/04/2007 07/09/2012   11186/15 23/02/2015 Sulejman SULTANOVIĆ 30/12/1966 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 13/09/2006 13/09/2006 09/04/2012   11315/15 23/02/2015 Nađid KOSTEROVIĆ 28/12/1963 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 02/10/2006 02/10/2006 06/04/2012   11348/15 23/02/2015 Fatima KIŠIJA 03/05/1964 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 30/12/2008 06/05/2009 06/09/2012   11359/15 23/02/2015 Sead DAUTBEGOVIĆ 02/04/1968 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 20/11/2006 18/12/2006 04/04/2012   14105/15 04/03/2015 Jasmina ŽDRALOVIĆ 28/02/1960 Bugojno   Hatidža KAPETAN Bugojno Municipal Court 13/06/2003 24/06/2004 22/05/2012