CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 17 juin 2016
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-164841
- Date
- 17 juin 2016
- Publication
- 17 juin 2016
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 17 June 2016   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 53461/15 Amanda KÓSA against Hungary lodged on 22 October 2015 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the education of a Roma pupil in a school established by the Greek Catholic Church in a Roma neighbourhood. Allegedly, the combined effects of the inauguration of the school, being the sole educational institution in the applicant’s neighbourhood, and the discontinuance of a bus service connecting that neighbourhood with a nearby city where other schools would have been available, resulted in the segregated education of Roma pupils.   QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.     Has the applicant exhausted domestic remedies, as required by Article   35 § 1 of the Convention, given that the situation giving rise to the application was examined by the domestic courts only in the framework of an actio popularis brought by the Chance for Children Foundation?   2.     Has there been a breach of the applicant’s rights under Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention to have education free of discrimination?   3.     Has the applicant been denied the right to education, guaranteed by Article 2 of Protocol No. 1, on account of the termination of the bus service connecting the applicant’s neighbourhood with a school providing integrated education for children from various social backgrounds?Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 17 juin 2016
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-164841
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel