CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 24 février 2016

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase }   Communicated on 24 February 2016   FOURTH SECTION Application no 5365/16 George Vichente BĂDOIU against Romania lodged on 5 January 2016 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged ill-treatment suffered by the applicant at the hands of police and the domestic authorities’ failure to conduct a prompt and effective investigation into his complaints. QUESTIONS 1.     Was the applicant subjected to ill-treatment, in breach of Article   3 of the Convention, as a result of the acts allegedly perpetrated on him by three   police officers on 8 October 2010?   2.     Did the authorities conduct an effective investigation between 2010 and 2015 into the applicant’s allegations under Article 3? In particular, did the investigation in question satisfy the requirements set out in the interlocutory decision rendered in preliminary chamber by the Timișoara Court of Appeal on 14   May   2014? Did the criminal investigation conducted by the domestic authorities fulfil the conditions of adequacy and promptness as required under the procedural head of Article 3 of the Convention?