CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 5 novembre 2014

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s2D57E2E { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; text-transform:uppercase }   Communicated on 28 September 2009 and 5 November 2014       FIRST SECTION Application no. 9094/05 Aleksey Alekseyevich BAYKOV against Russia lodged on 5 February 2005     The facts and complaints in this case have been summarised in the Court’s Statement of facts and Questions to the parties, which is available in HUDOC.   ADDITIONAL QUESTION Were the conditions of transport of Mr Baykov between the remand prison and the courthouse compatible with Article 3 of the Convention? In particular, the Government are requested to indicate:   (a)     How many times was he transported between the remand prison and the courthouse and on which dates?   (b)     How long was the way?   (c)     How much space was allowed for the applicant in the prison van?   (d)     Did the applicant have access to toilet during the trip?   (e)     Was drinking water available to him?   (f)     Were the transportation compartments ventilated on hot days and heated on cold days?