CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 25 septembre 2014

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2014)170 Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights in Twenty-eight cases against Poland   Application No. Case Date of the decision 4136/12 BANOK 17/09/2013 24367/12 BASIAKOWSKI 05/12/2013 34904/12 BUŁHAK 17/09/2013 9737/12 CIESIELSKI 19/11/2013 23456/12 CZARNIECKI 08/10/2013 7693/12 DZIERŻYŃSKA 19/11/2013 36847/04 GŁÓD 08/10/2013 77417/11 GLUBOWSKI 15/10/2013 25024/09 GOŁEK 01/10/2013 11149/12 GRZYMAŁA 07/01/2014 64947/12 JANKOWSKI 10/09/2013 49319/11 JURAK 17/09/2013 60393/11 KACZMAREK 01/10/2013 16522/11 KASPRZAK 21/05/2013 30346/11 KISIEL 12/11/2013 34681/10 KOPEĆ 19/11/2013 26104/08 LIEBERSBACH AND OTHERS 27/08/2013 24300/12 MATOGA 12/11/2013 9529/12 MYSZKA 19/11/2013 19734/12 ODI 17/12/2013 7324/12 PIETRZYKOWSKI 17/09/2013 28743/12 RACHUBA 0512/2013 46259/10 ROCH 27/08/2013 31169/11 SKOWROŃSKI 08/10/2013 73590/12 SZCZEBLEWSKI 27/08/2013 2385/11 SZPAROWSKI 01/10/2013 74907/11 WALCZYK 15/10/2013 37248/11 ZYZAK 05/12/2013   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 25 September 2014 at the 1208th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of the friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;   Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and   DECIDES to close their examination.