CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 26 août 2014

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s2D57E2E { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 26 August 2014   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 2092/08 Dimitar Georgiev MULIN and Anka Rangelova MULINA against Bulgaria lodged on 10 December 2007     The facts and complaints in this case have been summarised in the Court’s decision, which is available in HUDOC. QUESTIONs TO THE PARTIES Having regard to the procedural protection of the right to life (for the applicable principles, see for example Seidova and Others v. Bulgaria , no.   310/04, §§ 48-52, 18 November 2010), was the investigation by the domestic authorities of the death of the applicants’ son in breach of Article   2 of the Convention? Did the applicants have at their disposal an effective domestic remedy in that regard, as required by Article 13 of the Convention? The parties are requested to provide information on the course of the preliminary investigation in the case.