CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 4 février 2014

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s701081D1 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:left } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s2D57E2E { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }     Communicated on 4 February 2014       FOURTH SECTION Application no. 35661/11 Hugo Cristian PEREZ LIZASO against Finland lodged on 13 June 2011   The facts and complaints in this case have been summarised in the Court's decision, which is available in HUDOC. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     In the light of the applicant's claims and the documents which have been submitted, are there substantial grounds for believing that he would face a real risk of being subjected to treatment in breach of Article 3 of the Convention if the extradition order were enforced?   2.     How were the applicant's Article 3 complaints assessed by the domestic courts and authorities?