CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 19 juin 2013

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s3985515B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2013)127 Thirty one cases against Turkey Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 19 June 2013, at the 1174th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)   Case, Application No. Date of decision AKTAS, Application No. 21883/05 13/11/2012 AYGUL, Application No. 21884/05 13/11/2012 SAROHAN, Application No. 11980/07 13/11/2012 SOYTAS, Application No. 18328/07 15/06/2010 OZAN, Application No. 316/08 16/10/2012 ASLAN, Application No. 3401/08 06/07/2010 USTAOGLU, Application No. 16298/08 18/09/2012 OKSAS, Application No. 23646/08 16/10/2012 YOLDAS, Application No. 27097/08 04/09/2012 YAMALAK (10), Application No. 28212/08 18/09/2012 AKMAN, Application No. 43072/08 16/10/2012 ARANCAK, Application No. 8441/09 23/10/2012 SAHAP DOGAN, Application No. 10721/09 18/09/2012 OSME, Application No. 16817/09 23/10/2012 DEMIR, Application No. 22614/09 18/09/2012 EKMEZ, Application No. 28607/09 18/09/2012 OZ (2), Application No. 31459/09 18/09/2012 BAYAR, Application No. 36302/09 23/10/2012 OZTURK, Application No. 44584/09 18/09/2012 YILDIZ, Application No. 44648/09 16/10/2012 AKDEMIR, Application No. 59172/09 18/09/2012 DOGAN, Application No. 6370/10 04/09/2012 KETME, Application No. 17891/10 16/10/2012 ATSAK, Application No. 23600/10 13/11/2012 OZOGUL, Application No. 23610/10 02/10/2012 ACER, Application No. 28092/10 16/10/2012 GECER, Application No. 53959/10 16/10/2012 GUL, Application No. 16803/11 16/10/2012 ABDUKAYA, Application No. 25108/11 23/10/2012 DEMIR, Application No. 29978/11 18/09/2012 KUTLU, Application No. 73757/11 13/11/2012     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;   Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and   DECIDES to close their examination.