CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 3 septembre 2013

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .sDE57FCEB { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s8A38D3D2 { margin-left:14.17pt; padding-left:5.68pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt } .s2DED9654 { width:26.12pt; display:inline-block }       SECOND SECTION Application no. 43519/07 Ivan MILOJEVIĆ against Serbia and 2 other applications (see list appended)     The facts and complaints in these cases have been summarised in the Court’s decision, which is available in HUDOC. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Were the decisions of the Supreme Court, by which the applicants’ dismissals were upheld, sufficiently reasoned, as required by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, among others, K.M.C. v. Hungary , no. 19554/11, 10 July 2012)?   2. Regarding the applicants’ complaints about the alleged violation of their right to reputation and substantial livelihood:   a) Has there been an interference with the applicants’ right to respect for their private life, within the meaning of Article 8 § 1 of the Convention?   b) If so, was that interference with the applicants’ right to respect for their private life in accordance with the law in terms of Article 8 § 2 of the Convention?   c) Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?     APPENDIX   List of applications   43519/07   Milojević v. Serbia 43524/07   Radosavljević v. Serbia 45247/07   Veličković v. Serbia