CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 26 septembre 2012

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s5EE9E87A { font-size:6.67pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8FA89AC3 { width:96.04%; border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .sD81AB0A7 { height:11.35pt } .sC7B20E52 { width:64.06%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .sBCECD678 { width:35.94%; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sEB6B77C3 { width:64.06%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC702206A { width:35.94%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC2FF63FC { width:64.06%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s75B8D696 { width:35.94%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s5A722CD { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s3985515B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .s846B54EF { font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } Resolution CM/ResDH(2012)137 [1]   54 cases against Slovak Republic   Execution of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights   Case, Application No. Date of decision BACO, application No 13046/07 31/08/2010 BANYKO, application No 32523/07 07/09/2010 BARTL, application No 43298/07 14/12/2010 BARTL, application No 43795/07 07/09/2010 BARTL, application No 45072/09 14/06/2011 BARTL, application No 64004/09 14/06/2011 BOD, application No 62067/09 14/06/2011 BODNAR, application No 52200/07 22/06/2010 BRLJEVICOVA, application No 29102/09 22/11/2011 CAPCIKOVA, application No 27780/10 06/03/2012 DMF A. S., application No 34320/09 20/09/2011 DRAHULA, application No 32171/10 14/12/2010 FIGMIKOVA, application No 22573/09 28/06/2011 FRANKOVA, application No 23292/10 28/06/2011 FRKOVA, application No 16691/10 20/09/2011 GABCOVA, application No 42397/10 11/10/2011 HAMMEL, application No 49236/07 11/10/2011 HARNOC, application No 34095/08 05/10/2010 HORVATH, application No 28942/07 29/06/2010 HREBIK, application No 22973/10 27/03/2012 HRUSKOVA, application No 47381/08 05/10/2010 HUSOVSKY, application No 17727/10 07/12/2010 HUTAROVA, application No 12805/10 07/12/2010 KAKAS, application No 73947/10 28/06/2011 KENDERA and KENDEROVA, application No 9237/07 08/06/2010 KICINOVA, application No 3377/09 14/12/2010 KLISKY, application No 64091/09 28/06/2011 KOLESAROVA and others, application No 10482/09 08/03/2011 KOMANICKY, application No 54136/08 05/10/2010 KOMPAN and others, application No 50028/09 28/06/2011 KONKOLOVSKA, application No 23279/10 28/06/2011 KOSARKO, application No 9355/07 08/06/2010 KOSARKOVA, application No 9746/07 08/06/2010 KURUCOVA and others, application No 63946/09 20/09/2011 MAKSIM, application No 69587/10 11/10/2011 MATI and others, application No 51066/09 10/01/2012 MISKOVIC, application No 42992/10 28/06/2011 MULLEROVA and others, application No 5970/08 22/06/2010 OBSITOSOVA, application No 21647/09 07/09/2010 OLEJARNIK, application No 15876/10 11/10/2011 OLIJAS, application No 50568/08 25/01/2011 OLLAREK, application No 58135/09 07/09/2010 SCHREIBEROVA, application No 23271/10 28/06/2011 SLIVKA, application No 47881/09 07/09/2010 STRBOVA, application No 37610/08 28/09/2010 SUHAJ, application No 23265/10 28/06/2011 TELOVYCHOVNA JEDNOTA VSZ KOSICE, application No 40502/09 28/06/2011 TELOVYCHOVNA JEDNOTA VSZ KOSICE, application No 6550/10 28/06/2011 TELOVYCHOVNA JEDNOTA VSZ KOSICE, application No 10336/10 28/06/2011 TELOVYCHOVNA JEDNOTA VSZ KOSICE, application No 66684/10 28/06/2011 TOMKO, application No 45108/08 20/09/2011 VARGA, application No 3728/09 20/09/2011 ZIEGLER, application No 1817/07 30/11/2010 ZIMAN, application No 20670/10 18/10/2010   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided, unanimously, to strike these cases out of its list;   Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly-settlements were executed by the respondent State,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and   DECIDES to close their examination.   [1] Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 26 September 2012 at the 1150th Meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies.