CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 27 avril 2010

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s9AB72ABC { width:297.83pt; display:inline-block } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s72EB7DC5 { margin-top:18pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .s967D43C6 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7EE1C8F0 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.6pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sC702907E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:36.6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:-15.05pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32C36DF3 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:center } .s9D48DD53 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s34D46E87 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .s8378218E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:48.75pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .s4AAEB1A5 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:justify; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:10pt } .s434D37A9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sD0489F03 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .s673A384F { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:24pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .sFA22F38 { height:36pt } .sDE7C965D { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom; background-color:#c0c0c0 } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s8E6E7A5A { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:bottom; background-color:#c0c0c0 } .sD7287D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:9pt } .sFF5E486A { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:bottom; background-color:#c0c0c0 } .sF4F7263B { height:25.5pt } .s4CDBBA1E { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .s28412B5 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s58E06B2D { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s598389F7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .s2A6F1C75 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .sAE73F94A { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right; font-size:10pt } .sB7FB9D9B { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .sCD8BDE51 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s64645784 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s4B46122D { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s6A2D01EF { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:bottom } .sBCE76E33 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s782F68DE { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s553C38BC { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s39E90776 { height:58.5pt } .s7F14627 { height:62.4pt } .sEF610C7 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom; background-color:#c0c0c0 } .s49435D3E { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:bottom; background-color:#c0c0c0 } .s414C636 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:bottom; background-color:#c0c0c0 } .s52888CAE { height:96pt } .s721B4DFD { height:48pt } .s527BE8B1 { height:43.6pt } .sFC4B6575 { height:35.05pt } .s70B41AB9 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s349D86D0 { height:120pt } .sD4DA6D70 { height:41.55pt } .sF8C5E089 { height:79.25pt } .sC53D4500 { height:34.3pt } .sE3EEE089 { height:74.25pt } .s46E96D70 { height:48.75pt } .sCD93D88E { height:65.25pt } .sF05BE884 { height:89.25pt } .s76DF4627 { height:60.4pt } .s1FF4D88E { height:68.25pt } .sC6034500 { height:34.5pt } .sC60EE089 { height:75.75pt } .s312D6D70 { height:47.25pt } .sA8110776 { height:56.3pt } .sEA12756B { height:50.25pt } .s1A906575 { height:33.75pt } .sC444E8B1 { height:42.2pt } .s74FF26AD { height:114.9pt } .s9E2C4F24 { height:78pt } .sCE0E4F24 { height:72pt } .s4F536575 { height:38.75pt } .sEC5C756B { height:55.55pt } .sEC1E756B { height:55.75pt } .sAC88756B { height:56.25pt } .sFBCB6575 { height:30.75pt } .s2BBD305F { height:60pt } .s6C356CC2 { height:51pt } .sD3B76D70 { height:41.25pt } .sAD1F2E16 { height:105.85pt } .sCC32756B { height:51.75pt } .sDC69E884 { height:84.75pt } .sA53DE089 { height:71.25pt } .s7F15877A { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s46938418 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s2B2695D6 { padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:bottom } .sE0A42AA7 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .sA5810335 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s7C18482A { padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:bottom }   28 April 2010     THIRD SECTION MOLE and 144 others against Slovenia (see the attached table)   STATEMENT OF FACTS THE FACTS 1.     The applicants are current or previous prisoners in Dob Prison. For their personal data, see the attached table. They were represented before the Court by Odvetniška Družba Matoz o.p. d.o.o., a law firm practising in Koper. A.     The circumstances of the case 2.     The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. 1.     Occupancy level and the size of the cells 3 .     Dob Prison is by far the largest prison in Slovenia. It holds only male prisoners sentenced to a term of imprisonment of eighteen months or more. It has an official capacity of 233 inmates. According to the 2008 Annual Report by the Administration for the Execution of Penal Sentences, the prison held on average 443 prisoners in 2008. The official capacity was therefore exceeded by almost 90%. 4.   The applicants are or were held in shared cells (bedrooms). The large majority of applicants are or were held in cells measuring 57 sq. m. In most cases these cells hold between fifteen and nineteen inmates. In the former case, each prisoner has 3.8   sq.   m and in the latter case 3 sq. m of personal space. 5.     The prisoners in larger bedrooms share one lavatory and two washbasins, which appear to be situated in sanitary annexes. Owing to overcrowding, there are long delays in gaining access to these facilities. 6.     See the attached table for the exact size of each cell and the cell occupancy level. The personal space available to each applicant includes a bed and a cupboard. 2.     Other aspects of physical conditions in Dob Prison 7.     As out-of-cell time is limited to four hours per day, the applicants spend at least twenty hours per day in their cells confined to their beds. They have almost no recreation available. Owing to overcrowding, the ventilation is inadequate, temperatures are often extreme, and hygiene is lacking. The applicants suffer from constant disturbance from other inmates, which extends overnight, and they cannot enjoy a minimum level of privacy. The fact that the prisons are severely understaffed seriously affects the security and medical and psychological assistance available to prisoners. Several requests have been made by the prisoners for a transfer to another room or section, but to no avail as the prisons operate beyond the official capacity. Because of this, there is no proper system in operation that would allow drug users to be separated from the rest of the prison population and in particular from those who have been treated or are undergoing treatment for drug abuse. Contact with the outside world through the use of a phone or visits is severely limited. B.     Relevant domestic law 1.     General rules concerning living space available to prisoners 8.     The relevant parts of sections 42 and 43 of the Execution of Penal Sentences Act (“the EPSA” – Zakon o izvrševanju kazenskih sankcij , Official Gazette No. 22/2000) provide as follows: Section 42 “... (2)     A prisoner should normally be held in a single cell. Shared cells should not have more than eight beds. ...” Section 43 “A prisoner should be provided with the possibility of spending a minimum of two hours per day outdoors.” 9.     Rule 27 of the Rules on Execution of Sentences of Imprisonment ( Pravilnik o izvrševanju kazni zapora , Official Gazette no.   102/2000) provides: “Cells must be bright, dry, airy, and sufficiently large. Each prisoner should have at least 9 sq. m of space in a single cell, and 7 sq. m of space in a shared cell.” 2.     Remedies 10.     Domestic legislation provides for several remedies or supervisory mechanisms which, to a greater or lesser extent, could be applicable in respect of improper conditions of detention. However, at this stage there is little material available to show how these remedies work in practice and in the circumstances to which the applicants refer. (a)     Request for judicial protection 11.     Section 83 of the EPSA reads as follows: “(1)     A prisoner who claims to have suffered torture or other cruel forms of inhuman or degrading treatment may lodge a request for judicial protection. (2)     The prison authorities shall also forward to the public prosecutor any request made under the preceding paragraph.” (b)     Administrative complaint 12.     A formal manner of dealing with prisoners’ complaints is established within the administrative procedure whereby complaints are dealt with by the prison governor. An appeal can then be lodged with the Ministry of Justice (which is the ministry responsible for prisons). Section 85 of the EPSA provides: “(1) If a prisoner alleges a violation of other rights or any irregularities which are not subject to judicial protection, the prisoner may complain to the prison governor. (2) If the prisoner does not receive a reply to such a complaint within thirty days or is dissatisfied with the decision, he or she may lodge an application with the Ministry of Justice. (3) Prisoners also have the right to complain of a violation of their rights or of any irregularities referred to in subsection (1) above to other bodies responsible for the supervision of the prison.” 13.     This remedy does not in principle involve the participation of the complainant. The decision ultimately given in this procedure can then be challenged before the Administrative Court by means of an application for review. In this connection Article 157 of the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia ( Ustava Republike Slovenije – “the Constitution”) is of relevance. It provides: “A court with jurisdiction to review administrative decisions shall [have jurisdiction to] determine the legality of final individual decisions by State or local authorities or holders of public office concerning the rights or obligations or legal entitlements of individuals and organisations, if no other legal protection is specifically provided. If no other legal protection is provided, the court with jurisdiction to review administrative decisions shall also [have jurisdiction to] determine the legality of individual acts and decisions which encroach upon the constitutional rights of the individual.” More specifically, section 4 of the Administrative Disputes Act (Official Gazette No. 105/2006) provides: “(1) The courts in administrative proceedings shall also decide on the legality of decisions and acts which interfere with individuals’ human rights and fundamental freedoms, if no other judicial protection is provided...” (c)     Civil claim 14.     Article 26 of the Constitution provides: “Everyone shall have the right to compensation for damage caused by the unlawful acts of a person or body when performing a function or engaged in an activity on behalf of a State or local authority or as a holder of public office. ...” 15.     More specifically, section 84 of the EPSA reads as follows: “If a prisoner has suffered damage as a result of treatment referred to in the preceding section [see paragraph 14 above], he or she may claim compensation directly from the person responsible in accordance with the applicable laws.” 16.     Compensation can normally be claimed under the general rules of the Code of Obligations 2001 ( Obligacijski zakonik , Official Gazette no.   83/2001). (d)     Constitutional appeal 17.     As regards a constitutional appeal, it can only be used once all other remedies have been exhausted. In decision no. Up-863/04 of 22   February 2005, which concerned the alleged ill-treatment of a detainee, the Constitutional Court dismissed the appeal, finding that the appellant had failed to make use of the following remedies: a claim provided for in section   4 of the Administrative Disputes Act; a criminal complaint against those responsible or a subsidiary prosecution; and a complaint to the prison governor. (e)     Supervision of prisons by the Ministry of Justice and the district court judge 18.     Section 212 of the EPSA, in so far as relevant, provides: “(1) Supervision of the lawfulness of the treatment of prisoners shall be carried out by the Ministry and the judge of the district court... [They] shall acquaint themselves with how prisoners are treated and whether their rights are respected. This shall be done in the absence of prison staff, if so requested by the prisoner. (2) If the Ministry and the judge of the district court establish that the rights of prisoners have been violated, they shall do everything necessary for the protection of those rights. (3) The supervision referred to in the first paragraph may also be carried out by the Ombudsman for Human Rights ... and by international bodies for the protection of human rights and the prevention of torture and inhuman and degrading treatment and punishment.” C.     Relevant international standards 19.     The relevant extracts from the 2nd General Report by the Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) (CPT/Inf (92) 3) read as follows: “46.     Overcrowding is an issue of direct relevance to the CPT’s mandate. All the services and activities within a prison will be adversely affected if it is required to cater for more prisoners than it was designed to accommodate; the overall quality of life in the establishment will be lowered, perhaps significantly. Moreover, the level of overcrowding in a prison, or in a particular part of it, might be such as to be in itself inhuman or degrading from a physical standpoint. 47.     A satisfactory programme of activities (work, education, sport, etc.) is of crucial importance for the well-being of prisoners... [P]risoners cannot simply be left to languish for weeks, possibly months, locked up in their cells, and this regardless of how good material conditions might be within the cells. The CPT considers that one should aim at ensuring that prisoners in remand establishments are able to spend a reasonable part of the day (8 hours or more) outside their cells, engaged in purposeful activity of a varied nature... 48.     Specific mention should be made of outdoor exercise. The requirement that prisoners be allowed at least one hour of exercise in the open air every day is widely accepted as a basic safeguard... It is also axiomatic that outdoor exercise facilities should be reasonably spacious... 49.     Ready access to proper toilet facilities and the maintenance of good standards of hygiene are essential components of a humane environment... 50.     The CPT would add that it is particularly concerned when it finds a combination of overcrowding, poor regime activities and inadequate access to toilet/washing facilities in the same establishment. The cumulative effect of such conditions can prove extremely detrimental to prisoners.” 20.     The CPT’s 7th General Report ( CPT/Inf (97) 10) contains the following passage: “13.     As the CPT pointed out in its 2nd General Report, prison overcrowding is an issue of direct relevance to the Committee’s mandate (cf. CPT/Inf (92) 3, paragraph   46). An overcrowded prison entails cramped and unhygienic accommodation; a constant lack of privacy (even when performing such basic tasks as using a sanitary facility); reduced out-of-cell activities, due to demand outstripping the staff and facilities available; overburdened health-care services; increased tension and hence more violence between prisoners and between prisoners and staff. This list is far from exhaustive. The CPT has been led to conclude on more than one occasion that the adverse effects of overcrowding have resulted in inhuman and degrading conditions of detention...” 21.     The CPT’s 11th General Report (CPT/Inf (2001) 16) contains the following passages: “28.     The phenomenon of prison overcrowding continues to blight penitentiary systems across Europe and seriously undermines attempts to improve conditions of detention. The negative effects of prison overcrowding have already been highlighted in previous General Reports... 29.     In a number of countries visited by the CPT, particularly in central and eastern Europe, inmate accommodation often consists of large capacity dormitories which contain all or most of the facilities used by prisoners on a daily basis, such as sleeping and living areas as well as sanitary facilities. The CPT has objections to the very principle of such accommodation arrangements in closed prisons and those objections are reinforced when, as is frequently the case, the dormitories in question are found to hold prisoners under extremely cramped and insalubrious conditions... Large-capacity dormitories inevitably imply a lack of privacy for prisoners in their everyday lives... All these problems are exacerbated when the numbers held go beyond a reasonable occupancy level; further, in such a situation the excessive burden on communal facilities such as washbasins or lavatories and the insufficient ventilation for so many persons will often lead to deplorable conditions. 30.     The CPT frequently encounters devices, such as metal shutters, slats, or plates fitted to cell windows, which deprive prisoners of access to natural light and prevent fresh air from entering the accommodation. They are a particularly common feature of establishments holding pre-trial prisoners. The CPT fully accepts that specific security measures designed to prevent the risk of collusion and/or criminal activities may well be required in respect of certain prisoners... [E]ven when such measures are required, they should never involve depriving the prisoners concerned of natural light and fresh air. The latter are basic elements of life which every prisoner is entitled to enjoy...” 22.     The relevant extracts from the Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to Member States of the Council of Europe on the European Prison Rules (Rec (2006)2, adopted on 11 January 2006 at the 952nd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) read as follows: “... 1.     All persons deprived of their liberty shall be treated with respect for their human rights. ... 3.     Restrictions placed on persons deprived of their liberty shall be the minimum necessary and proportionate to the legitimate objective for which they are imposed. 4.     Prison conditions that infringe prisoners’ human rights are not justified by lack of resources. 5.     Life in prison shall approximate as closely as possible the positive aspects of life in the community. 6.     All detention shall be managed so as to facilitate the reintegration into free society of persons who have been deprived of their liberty. ... 18.1     The accommodation provided for prisoners, and in particular all sleeping accommodation, shall respect human dignity and, as far as possible, privacy, and meet the requirements of health and hygiene, due regard being paid to climatic conditions and especially to floor space, cubic content of air, lighting, heating and ventilation. 18.2     In all buildings where prisoners are required to live, work or congregate: a.     the windows shall be large enough to enable the prisoners to read or work by natural light in normal conditions and shall allow the entrance of fresh air except where there is an adequate air conditioning system; b.     artificial light shall satisfy recognised technical standards ... 18.3     Specific minimum requirements in respect of the matters referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be set in national law. 18.4     National law shall provide mechanisms for ensuring that these minimum requirements are not breached by the overcrowding of prisons. 18.5     Prisoners shall normally be accommodated during the night in individual cells except where it is preferable for them to share sleeping accommodation. 18.6     Accommodation shall only be shared if it is suitable for this purpose and shall be occupied by prisoners suitable to associate with each other. ... 19.1     All parts of every prison shall be properly maintained and kept clean at all times. 19.2     When prisoners are admitted to prison the cells or other accommodation to which they are allocated shall be clean. 19.3     Prisoners shall have ready access to sanitary facilities that are hygienic and respect privacy. 19.4     Adequate facilities shall be provided so that every prisoner may have a bath or shower, at a temperature suitable to the climate, if possible daily but at least twice a week (or more frequently if necessary) in the interest of general hygiene. 19.5     Prisoners shall keep their persons, clothing and sleeping accommodation clean and tidy. 19.6     The prison authorities shall provide them with the means for doing so including toiletries and general cleaning implements and materials.” D.     Relevant international and domestic reports 1.     Reports by the CPT 23.     The CPT visited Dob Prison in 1995 and 2001. 24.     In 1995 the number of prisoners held in the Dob prison was significantly lower than it is currently. 208 prisoners were held in the relevant sections of Dob Prison (the closed sections) (see document CPT/Inf (96) 18). Following the visit in 2001, the following recommendations were made to the Slovenian authorities (CPT/Inf (2002) 36): “i.     Dob Prison 56.     ... The CPT recommends that efforts be made to reduce the occupancy rate of the 60 m² dormitories, having regard to the new minimum standards for prison accommodation. Further, the Committee wishes to reiterate that smaller accommodation units for prisoner[s] are far preferable to large units such as the 60 m² dormitories seen in Dob Prison. ...” 2.   The 2008 Annual Report by the Administration for the Execution of Penal Sentences 25.     In the chapter concerning the living conditions in Slovenian prisons, the Administration for the Execution of Penal Sentences stated the following (p. 98): “... Poor living conditions are coupled with overcrowding, which is most present in the large prisons in Slovenia, Dob, Ljubljana and Maribor. The urgency of improving living conditions has been stressed by the Ombudsman for Human Rights, the CPT and other institutions. ... It is understandable that such living conditions adversely affect prisoners’ hygiene and privacy. Poor living conditions sometimes also obstruct the exercise of prisoners’ rights. In some establishments, prisoners on remand live in worse conditions than sentenced prisoners. The outdated and inadequate furniture in living rooms and other areas presents an additional problem.” 3.     Report by the Slovenian Ombudsman for Human Rights 26.     On 17 and 18 March 2009 the Ombudsman for Human Rights conducted a visit to Dob Prison under the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and issued a report, which reads as follows: “... the official capacity is still 296 prisoners, including 233 prisoners in the closed section, 40 prisoners in the semi-open section and 23 prisoners in the open section. At the time of our visit, the establishment held 497 prisoners, including 433 in the closed section, which is 200 beyond the official capacity. The prison administration has stressed that it has previously been faced with an even higher occupancy rate. During a certain period in 2008, the prison held 526 prisoners... We found that since our last visit the overcrowding has only intensified. This raises concerns. The prison administration has agreed with this finding and stressed that it is of particular concern that the overcrowding cannot be reduced by placing prisoners in other establishments as the number of prisoners is rising everywhere. On the other hand, we welcome the fact that the preparatory work on the renovation and expansion of the prison has finally started. ... We have again stressed that in most cases the furniture in the rooms is completely outdated and therefore urgent repairs and replacements are needed. ... The closed section had sufficient outside areas at the time of the visit ... According to the prison administration, illegal drugs present a serious problem. About half of the prisoners are addicted to drugs or alcohol... Apart from the lack of space, the drug-free section also cannot operate because of the lack of appropriate staff.” COMPLAINTS 27.     The applicants complain that the conditions of their detention in Dob Prison amounted to a violation of Articles 3 and 8 of the Convention. In particular, they complain of severe overcrowding, which led to a lack of personal space, poor sanitary conditions, insufficient ventilation, deprivation of privacy, excessive restrictions on out-of-cell time, an inadequate level of heath care and psychological assistance, and reduced security. 28.     They also submit that the situation amounted to a structural problem, which has been acknowledged by the domestic authorities. 29.     In addition, the applicants complain that owing to the systemic nature of the violation, they do not have any effective remedy at their disposal. In any event, there is no evidence that the remedies which are available in theory could work effectively in practice when it comes to prison conditions and treatment of prisoners. They invoke Article 13 on that account. 30.     Certain applicants submit further complaints, which are noted in the attached table. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES     1.     In respect of each applicant and each cell in which he was held, the Government are requested to   comment on   the following points.   (a)     Indicate the cell number and the dates of the applicant’s stay. (b)     What was the floor surface of the cell (in square metres)? (c)     How many beds were available in the cell at the time of the applicant’s stay? (d)     How many detainees were held in the cell at the time of the applicant’s stay? Indicate the maximum number of detainees, not the average. (e)     Was the cell equipped with a functioning ventilation system at the time of the applicant’s stay? (f)     For each applicant, indicate the duration of out-of-cell time available to him per day and the area available for this purpose. (g)     For each applicant, indicate the frequency and the duration of outdoor exercise, the surface area of the exercise yard (in square metres) he can use during exercise and the type of the roof above the yard (metal bars, solid roof, netting, etc.). (h)     What were the sanitary conditions in respect of the cells in which the applicants were held? (i)     What measures were taken to provide adequate hygiene and to prevent transmission of diseases such as Hepatitis C at the time of the applicant’s stay?   Where applicable, the Government are requested to provide the above information also as regards the period following the lodging of the applications.   2.     As regards each applicant, did the conditions of his detention amount to treatment prohibited by Article 3 of the Convention?   3.     Has there been an unjustified interference with each applicant’s right to respect for his private life, within the meaning of Article 8 § 1 of the Convention?   4.     Do these cases reveal the existence of a structural problem? Does this situation amount to “a practice incompatible with the Convention” (see Bottazzi v.   Italy [GC], no.   34884/97, §   22, ECHR 1999 ‑ V)?   5.     Did the applicants have effective domestic remedies available – as required by Article 13 of the Convention – for their complaint about the inhuman and degrading conditions of their detention? In particular, was there an effective mechanism, sufficiently established in law and practice, that would have allowed the authorities to put an end to the continuing violation of the applicants’ rights under Article 3 while they were still in detention, and/or to grant them adequate compensation for non-pecuniary damage after their detention had already ended?   6.     What is the time frame within which the construction project concerning the Dob Prison will be completed?       APP.NO. NAME SURNAME NATIONALITY BIRTH DATE INTRODUCTION DATE SIZE OF CELL/OCCUPANCY LEVEL EST. LENGTH OF STAY Additional complaints 5700/10 Jasmin Mole Slovene 28/12/1976 24/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 01/05 - 08/11   5704/10 Elvis Livadić Slovene 07/08/1988 24/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 04/09 - 06/24   5711/10 Rajko Lalić Slovene 15/03/1961 24/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) 09/07 - 02/11   5714/10 Ismet Smajović Serbian 29/10/1965 24/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 05/06 - 06/14   5719/10 Roman Tivadar Slovene 26/12/1974 24/12/2009 57m²/18 (3,16m²) 01/09 - 07/12   5720/10 Radovan Mišić Bosnia and Herzegovina 17/04/1962 18/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) 05/08 - 04/11 The applicant complains that he suffered from severe distress and other related illnesses. 5724/10 Niko Stariha Slovene 01/12/1977 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 06/07 - 05/10     APP.NO. NAME SURNAME NATIONALITY BIRTH DATE INTRODUCTION DATE SIZE OF CELL/OCCUPANCY LEVEL EST. LENGTH OF STAY Additional complaints 5728/10 Đorđe Petrović Slovene 05/05/1955 18/12/2009 Between April 2006 and May 2008: 57m²/17 (3,35m²); Currently: 3.52m² of personal space (p.s.) 03/06 - 03/10   5729/10 Elvir Mukeljić Slovene 17/06/1978 18/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) 05/08 - 01/10   5733/10 Ivan Plečko Slovene 13/08/1970 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 09/08 - 06/11   5749/10 Ivo Šolaja Slovene 25/08/1956 18/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) 03/09 - 07/12   5750/10 Zoltan Varadi Slovakia 01/05/1985 24/12/2009 57m²/18 (3,16m²) 03/08 - 07/18   5753/10 Nermin Lović Slovene 21/03/1974 18/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) 05/07 - 08/10   5754/10 Drago Prajner Slovene 13/04/1971 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 07/07 - 09/13   5759/10 Stanko Kolompar Slovene 13/07/1977 18/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) 02/09 - 12/10   APP.NO. NAME SURNAME NATIONALITY BIRTH DATE INTRODUCTION DATE SIZE OF CELL/OCCUPANCY LEVEL EST. LENGTH OF STAY Additional complaints 5767/10 Jasmin Mešić Slovene 22/05/1979 24/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 07/06 - 06/14 The applicant raises allegations as to the transmission of Hepatitis C in the prison and complains about improper medical treatment. 5778/10 Astor Brajdič Slovene 03/11/1981 18/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) 12/08 - 09/12 The applicant complains that he suffered trauma because of racial harassment by fellow prisoners (the applicant is of Roma origin) and that no protective measures were taken by authorities. 5780/10 Roman Viličnik Slovene 18/12/1984 18/12/2009 57m²/18 (3,16m²) 01/09 - 01/12   5783/10 Drago Pečko Slovene 25/12/1957 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 01/09 - 01/12   5787/10 Zoran Benić Slovene 29/11/1975 24/12/2009 57m²/18 (3,16 m²) 02/08 - 04/10   5798/10 Anđelko Vardič Slovene 26/01/1971 18/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) 06/07 - 03/11   APP.NO. NAME SURNAME NATIONALITY BIRTH DATE INTRODUCTION DATE SIZE OF CELL/OCCUPANCY LEVEL EST. LENGTH OF STAY Additional complaints 5801/10 Danijel Bekš Slovene 05/08/1963 18/12/2009 57m²/18 (3,16 m²) 10/06 - 12/12   5803/10 Albin Božičnik Slovene 30/01/1966 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 07/07 - 11/12   5804/10 Enis Bajić Slovene 11/03/1976 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 04/07 - 04/11   5807/10 Elvir Šabotič Montenegrin 13/07/1975 18/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) 09/05 - 12/10   5811/10 Matjaž Jusič Slovene 13/08/1958 18/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) 06/07 - 11/12   5814/10 Miroslav Adler Slovene 06/03/1977 18/12/2009 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 01/08 - 01/20   5816/10 Niko Šotner Slovene 07/03/1980 18/12/2009 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 07/09 - 01/13 The applicant raises allegations as to the transmission of Hepatitis C in the prison. 5823/10 Marko Kos Slovene 15/08/1966 18/12/2009 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 04/06 - 03/18   APP.NO. NAME SURNAME NATIONALITY BIRTH DATE INTRODUCTION DATE SIZE OF CELL/OCCUPANCY LEVEL EST. LENGTH OF STAY Additional complaints 5827/10 Damijan Kranjec Slovene 12/02/1981 18/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) 03/09 - 11/10   5829/10 Boris Ahec Slovene 25/02/1955 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 04/09 - 05/12   5830/10 Slobodan Katič Slovene 02/01/1960 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 02/08 - 05/14 The applicant complains that his treatment for drug abuse was unsuccessful due to improper prison conditions. 5831/10 Haris Ajdarović Slovene 26/04/1983 24/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) 08/07 - 08/10   5835/10 Darinko Brajdič Slovene 18/12/1968 08/01/2010 57m²/18 (3,16 m²) 10/05 - 11/18 The applicant complains that he was a victim of an accident at work in the prison. 5841/10 Aleš Kovačič Slovene 06/04/1982 18/12/2009 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 05/08 - 08/12   5855/10 Bogomir Demšar Slovene 29/01/1958 18/12/2009 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 01/07 - 01/15   5864/10 Marko Kaluža Slovene 26/08/1967 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 03/08 - 03/10   APP.NO. NAME SURNAME NATIONALITY BIRTH DATE INTRODUCTION DATE SIZE OF CELL/OCCUPANCY LEVEL EST. LENGTH OF STAY Additional complaints 5876/10 Martin Kos Slovene 28/10/1960 18/12/2009 57m²/18 (3,16 m²) 11/07 - 02/12   5889/10 Milan Komadina Slovene 19/07/1963 18/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) Since 06/09   5896/10 Marjan Kunc Slovene 18/05/1975 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 02/06 - 07/12   5898/10 Franc Pevc Slovene 21/11/1963 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 05/07 - 07/11   5900/10 Gorazd Bukvič Slovene 12/09/1981 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 12/07 - 02/18   5906/10 Goran Ilibašić Croatian 09/06/1976 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 08/06 - 04/12   5911/10 Milan Plavčak Slovene 26/08/1973 18/12/2009 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 10/08 - 06/10   5917/10 Peter Rijavec Slovene 08/12/1977 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 07/08 - 10/11   5939/10 Goran Đurković Slovene 15/05/1979 08/01/2010 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 08/09 - 02/11   5940/10 Miloš Zogović Slovene 11/06/1979 08/01/2010 57m²/18 (3,16 m²) 02/06 - 12/11   5941/10 Duško Cvijanović Slovene 11/10/1973 08/01/2010 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 03/08 - 10/10   APP.NO. NAME SURNAME NATIONALITY BIRTH DATE INTRODUCTION DATE SIZE OF CELL/OCCUPANCY LEVEL EST. LENGTH OF STAY Additional complaints 5951/10 Dragutin Srpak Slovene 04/02/1956 18/12/2009 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 07/07 - 05/15 The applicant complains that he suffered from severe distress and that his complaints were not answered by the authorities. 5952/10 Franjo Ivanušič Croatian 13/03/1961 08/01/2010 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 07/07 - 04/11   5956/10 Sašo Tuksar Slovene 19/09/1967 18/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) 05/09 - 09/11   5958/10 Jasmin Kostevc Slovene 11/08/1974 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 07/08 - 02/10   5959/10 Danijel Fabijančič Slovene 15/05/1978 08/01/2010 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 10/04 - 01/15   5964/10 Alojz Polajšer Slovene 15/10/1957 18/12/2009 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 01/08 - 07/10   5970/10 Matej Kumin Slovene 03/01/1983 18/12/2009 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 02/05 - 05/17   APP.NO. NAME SURNAME NATIONALITY BIRTH DATE INTRODUCTION DATE SIZE OF CELL/OCCUPANCY LEVEL EST. LENGTH OF STAY Additional complaints 5971/10 Matjaž Šušteršič Slovene 11/03/1969 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 07/07 - 07/10 The applicant complains that he was twice beaten and injured by fellow prisoners. 5973/10 Aleš Erjavec Slovene 01/11/1976 08/01/2010 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 03/09 - 03/11   5974/10 Zeni Demiri Slovene 01/04/1965 18/12/2009 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 10/08 - 10/11   5980/10 Marjan Zupanič Slovene 11/07/1966 18/12/2009 57m²/18 (3,16 m²) 11/06 - 08/18   5987/10 Zoran Dedić Slovene 12/11/1981 24/12/2009 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 06/09 - 03/11   5988/10 Iztok Nilič Slovene 28/08/1977 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 05/08 - 03/?   6007/10 Goran Maksimovič Slovene 22/10/1976 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 08/08 - 05/14   6008/10 Sead Batanović Slovene 28/07/1971 24/12/2009 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 07/08 - 07/10   6014/10 Damjan Mikložič Slovene 24/08/1980 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 07/03 - 12/13   6022/10 Tihomir Mijalković Serbian 23/02/1974 18/12/2009 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 09/07 - 05/13   APP.NO. NAME SURNAME NATIONALITY BIRTH DATE INTRODUCTION DATE SIZE OF CELL/OCCUPANCY LEVEL EST. LENGTH OF STAY Additional complaints 6030/10 Marko Celarc Slovene 18/07/1957 18/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) 05/03 - 03/11   6040/10 Boštjan Koprivnikar Slovene 05/05/1979 18/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) 12/07 - 12/11   6057/10 Darko Šinko Slovene 11/12/1967 24/12/2009 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 09/02 - 10/10 The applicant raises allegations as to the transmission of Hepatitis C in the prison. 6074/10 Zlato Farčnik Slovene 21/03/1972 18/12/2009 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 07/08 - 10/18   6084/10 Lenart Ciglar Slovene 15/04/1983 18/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) Since June 2009: 3.75m² of p.s. 06/05 - 03/18   6091/10 Jože Kac Slovene 17/04/1965 18/12/2009 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 05/06 - 11/10   6102/10 Dušan Nedeljko Slovene 12/12/1966 18/12/2009 57m²/18 (3,16m²) 10/07 - 10/11   APP.NO. NAME SURNAME NATIONALITY BIRTH DATE INTRODUCTION DATE SIZE OF CELL/OCCUPANCY LEVEL EST. LENGTH OF STAY Additional complaints 6108/10 Martin Vidovič Slovene 12/09/1953 18/12/2009 57m²/18 (3,16m²) 05/07 - 11/10   6117/10 Štefan Mitrovič Slovene 23/12/1961 18/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) 07/00 - 09/19   6118/10 Franc Arh Slovene 06/04/1973 18/12/2009 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 04/07 - 10/14   6119/10 Denis Ambroželj Slovene 15/07/1976 18/12/2009 57m²/15 (3,8m²) Since March 2009   6122/10 Redžep Aksalić Montenegrin 15/01/1961 18/12/2009 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 05/02 - 07/15   6125/10 Albin Mravljak Slovene 14/12/1957 18/12/2009 57m²/18 (3,16m²) 10/07 - 10/21 The applicant complains that he suffered from severe distress and other related illnesses. APP.NO. NAME SURNAME NATIONALITY BIRTH DATE INTRODUCTION DATE SIZE OF CELL/OCCUPANCY LEVEL EST. LENGTH OF STAY Additional complaints 6131/10 Milan Mitrič Slovene 15/02/1979 18/12/2009 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 05/09 - 05/13 The applicant complains that he suffered from heart disease and was forced to stay with smokers. 6140/10 Drago Kovačič Slovene 17/03/1962 18/12/2009 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 09/05 - 07/14   6154/10 Robert Rauter Slovene 08/04/1976 18/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) 03/04 - 07/32   6159/10 Tomaž Vuk Slovene 03/10/1967 18/12/2009 57m²/18 (3,16 m²) Since September 2009   6166/10 Zim Memeti Slovene 27/12/1967 18/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) 10/07 - 08/19   6170/10 Drago Majcen Slovene 18/09/1958 24/12/2009 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 10/02 - 10/12 The applicant raises allegations as to the transmission of Hepatitis C and complains about improper medical treatment. 6171/10 Peter Orešič Slovene 16/05/1975 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 05/99 - 01/16   APP.NO. NAME SURNAME NATIONALITY BIRTH DATE INTRODUCTION DATE SIZE OF CELL/OCCUPANCY LEVEL EST. LENGTH OF STAY Additional complaints 6179/10 Lovro Vadlja Slovene 04/03/1985 18/12/2009 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 08/07 - 06/26   6182/10 Bojan Slana Slovene 28/11/1975 24/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) 04/06 - 09/19   6188/10 Marinko Avgustinović Slovene 08/09/1980 18/12/2009 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 01/08 - 07/11   6195/10 Janez Skubic Slovene 18/01/1986 24/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) 02/09 - 04/11   6225/10 Stojan Radin Slovene 27/05/1959 24/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) 06/06 - 10/17   6267/10 Branko Ločnikar Slovene 17/03/1963 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 03/08 - 09/11   6275/10 Frank Palmer Slovene 28/12/1965 18/12/2009 57m²/18 (3,16m²); Currently; 3.75m² of p.s. 10/07 - 07/10   APP.NO. NAME SURNAME NATIONALITY BIRTH DATE INTRODUCTION DATE SIZE OF CELL/OCCUPANCY LEVEL EST. LENGTH OF STAY Additional complaints 6279/10 Vanja Pirnat Slovene 22/01/1959 18/12/2009 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 01/08 - 08/11   6285/10 Jure Trupej Slovene 03/09/1983 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 05/09 - 03/12 The applicant claims he became a drug addict in the prison and expresses fears over the transmission of Hepatitis C in the prison. 6309/10 Riki Bukvić Croatian 29/01/1985 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 07/09 - 3/11   6375/10 Slavko Zlodej Slovene 31/10/1963 22/01/2010 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 9/09 - 2/13   6399/10 Zlatko Kajtazović Slovene 06/03/1964 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 12/08 - 12/11 The applicant complains about lack of safety measures against potential fire. 6408/10 Milorad Draganić Bosnia and Herzegovina 31/07/1969 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 12/08 - 09/12   6427/10 Anton Krempl Slovene 26/04/1960 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 05/07 - 05/11   6438/10 Primož Koritnik Slovene 10/09/1991 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 08/08 - 05/14       APP.NO. NAME SURNAME NATIONALITY BIRTH DATE INTRODUCTION DATE SIZE OF CELL/OCCUPANCY LEVEL EST. LENGTH OF STAY Additional complaints 6452/10 Marko Dragišić Slovene 10/01/1979 18/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) 11/06 - 03/11 The applicant complains that he sustained injuries at work in the prison due to improper safety conditions. 6497/10 Jaka Pavlinič Slovene 09/05/1985 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) Since July 2009   6519/10 Aleksandar Djurdjević Slovene 26/09/1979 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 05/07 - 06/13   6530/10 Darko Eržen Slovene 12/11/1957 18/12/2009 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 02/08 - 05/17   6538/10 Ahmet Bajraktari Slovene 11/10/1962 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 04/08 - 12/21   6548/10 Anton Planinšec Slovene 12/02/1963 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 12/05 - 06/15   6552/10 Jasmin Čivović Slovene 13/07/1977 18/12/2009 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 03/07 - 09/10   6559/10 Tomaž Čuden Slovene 01/07/1972 18/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) 07/06 - 01/10 The applicant complains that he was beaten several times by fellow prisoners. APP.NO. NAME SURNAME NATIONALITY BIRTH DATE INTRODUCTION DATE SIZE OF CELL/OCCUPANCY LEVEL EST. LENGTH OF STAY Additional complaints 6613/10 Vehid Delić Slovene 13/10/1980 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²); Since spring 2007: 3.7m² of p.s. 06/06 - 09/11   6620/10 Sebastjan Heine Slovene 28/05/1983 18/12/2009 60m²/17 (3,75m²) 05/08 - 05/11   6623/10 Radivoj Dubac Slovene 11/06/1969 18/12/2009 57m²/18 (3,16 m²) 01/08 - 08/11   6634/10 Peter Vogrinc Slovene 16/09/1979 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 02/08 - 03/10   6647/10 Nebojša Šegota Slovene 10/02/1969 18/12/2009 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 07/08 - 11/15   6653/10 Danilo Tivadar Slovene 10/02/1976 18/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) 09/08 - 03/12   6682/10 Srečko Ferenc Slovene 01/03/1968 18/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) 02/09 - 03/11 The applicant complains that his injuries have not been properly treated in the prison. APP.NO. NAME SURNAME NATIONALITY BIRTH DATE INTRODUCTION DATE SIZE OF CELL/OCCUPANCY LEVEL EST. LENGTH OF STAY Additional complaints 6684/10 Danilo Pohorec Slovene 07/01/1955 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 06/08 - 06/10 The applicant complains that he suffered from severe distress as a result of which he was hospitalised on four occasions. 6690/10 Edin Tirić Slovene 06/03/1981 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 04/09 - 12/11   6888/10 Janko Kermc Slovene 18/02/1976 18/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) 07/08 - 01/16   6893/10 Damir Glavica Slovene 30/01/1974 18/12/2009 57m²/15 (3,8m²) 08/04 - 01/13   6910/10 Vojko Brajdič Slovene 10/03/1970 18/12/2009 57m²/19 (3m²) 07/07 - 02/13   6916/10 Jernej Brezovšček Slovene 25/06/1974 18/12/2009 57m²/18 (3,16m²) 11/08 - 11/11   6918/10 Ramo Bislimi Slovene 16/03/1950 18/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) 04/07 - 03/13   APP.NO. NAME SURNAME NATIONALITY BIRTH DATE INTRODUCTION DATE SIZE OF CELL/OCCUPANCY LEVEL EST. LENGTH OF STAY Additional complaints 6922/10 Dušan Skobir Slovene 15/01/1969 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 09/05 - 10/10   6927/10 Dejan Jović Slovene 17/03/1978 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 12/08 - 06/11   6934/10 Branko Grant Slovene 22/08/1951 18/12/2009 57m²/18 (3,16 m²) 02/08 - 02/15   6948/10 Zdenko Stanivuk Slovene 19/07/1977 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 02/05 - 08/19   6952/10 Anton Gorenjec Slovene 13/01/1967 18/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) 06/07 - 06/10   6954/10 Roman Čmak Slovene 14/03/1965 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 07/07 - 03/12   6961/10 Stephen Casiraghi Slovene 31/05/1968 18/12/2009 57m²/16 (3,56m²) 04/08 - 02/24   6964/10 Marjan Koser Slovene 20/11/1961 18/12/2009 57m²/17 (3,35m²) 05/07 - 06/12   6971/10 Damjan Vilčnik Slovene 29/05/1980 18/12/2009 2007-2009: 20m²/4 (5m²) (Hospital room); Currently: 3.3m² of p.s. 06/05 - 06/10   APP.NO. NAME SURNAME NATIONALITY BIRTH DATE INTRODUCTION DATE SIZE OF CELL/OCCUPANCY LEVEL EST. LENGTH OF STAY Additional complaints 6974/10 Samir Sejfović Slovene 03/08/1976 18/12/20