CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 17 janvier 2012
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-109948
- Date
- 17 janvier 2012
- Publication
- 17 janvier 2012
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulAnalyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s673A384F { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:24pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } THIRD SECTION Application no. 19279/03 by Igor BANNIKOV against Latvia   QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES   1.     Was the length of the applicant’s pre-trial detention in breach of the “reasonable time” requirement of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention?   2.     Has there been an interference with the applicant’s right to respect for his private and family life, within the meaning of Article 8 § 1 of the Convention on account of the impossibility of his receiving long-term visits from his partner and her daughter whilst in prison? If so, was that interference in accordance with the law and necessary in terms of Article 8 § 2?   The parties are requested to submit documents or information therein concerning the applicant’s family ties in Latvia, including with M.B. and   R.B.Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 17 janvier 2012
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-109948
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel