CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 8 mars 2012

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sA427913 { font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s5A722CD { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s3985515B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sE188E4CB { margin-right:9pt; margin-left:9pt; border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse; } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s70B41AB9 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .s846B54EF { font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } Resolution CM/ResDH(2012)42 [1]   Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights 82 cases against Poland     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent state and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided, unanimously, to strike these cases out of its list;   Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly-settlements were executed by the respondent State,     DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and   DECIDES to close its examination. Case, Application No. Date of decision BIELECKI, application No 9546/02 25/01/2011 SZCZYGIEL, application No 34354/02 08/03/2011 BOSOWSKI, application No 15349/03 02/11/2010 MALUSZCZAK, application No 25618/03 08/02/2011 ZDAN, application No 3826/04 08/03/2011 TOMCZYK, application No 7784/04 08/03/2011 BUDA, application No 45450/04 08/02/2011 ZAWAL, application No 1854/05 08/03/2011 SOKOLOWSKI, application No 7156/05 18/10/2010 DOKUPIL, application No 10121/05 08/02/2011 SNIEDA, application No 11031/06 22/03/2011 KARPINSKI, application No 15031/06 30/11/2010 GARBACZ, application No 15081/06 08/03/2011 DRADRACH, application No 30074/06 23/11/2010 BAK, application No 40258/06 08/03/2011 DEMIANIUK, application No 45200/06 08/03/2011 PLATEK, application No 46609/06 08/03/2011 TURZYNSKI, application No 11619/07 18/01/2011 GOLCZYK, application No 13805/07 29/06/2010 MARAS, application No 19184/07 25/01/2011 NOZOWNIK, application No 20973/07 17/05/2011 CICHOWSKI, application No 21195/07 29/06/2010 PIEKARZ, application No 28198/07 18/01/2011 Ryszard ZAJAC, application No 32471/07 22/06/2010 STACHOWSKA, application No 49545/07 05/04/2011 KUZLAK (no 3), application No 6484/08 08/03/2011 NIEWINSKI, application No 6711/08 11/01/2011 KURP, application No 9709/08 29/06/2010 KOWALCZYK (II), application No 24622/08 17/05/2011 GINTER, application No 28593/08 21/09/2010 HODUN, application No 31436/08 08/06/2010 KULCZYCKI, application No 34006/08 29/06/2010 GWOREK, application No 34838/08 18/10/2010 GMEREK, application No 43064/08 29/06/2010 KOZDOJ, application No 45769/08 19/01/2010 STENKA, application No 52431/08 02/11/2010 WISNIEWSKA, application No 60519/08 17/05/2011 SZYMBORSKI AND GUZ, application No 61069/08 23/11/2010 CHABOWSKI, application No 61538/08 05/10/2010 OSINSKI (II), application No 1422/09 17/05/2011 LASKOWSKI, application No 6164/09 16/11/2010 SAPIEJKA, application No 10058/09 14/12/2010 OCHNIO, application No 11316/09 21/09/2010 TARASIEWICZ, application No 11586/09 18/10/2010 KOKOCINSKI, application No 11747/09 03/05/2011 CHRABASZCZ, application No 11918/09 11/01/2011 ZMYSLOWSKA-KULA, application No 13226/09 07/12/2010 ZYCH, application No 16113/09 12/04/2011 SOBCZYK, application No 17197/09 21/09/2010 WARDZINSKI, application No 20769/09 24/05/2011 KALETA, application No 21081/09 31/08/2010 STRZYZEWSKI, application No 23345/09 31/08/2010 TOMCZAK, application No 23651/09 02/11/2010 DMOCH, application No 23910/09 22/02/2011 PERLINSKI (III), application No 26236/09 22/02/2011 JAROCKI (XVII), application No 27146/09 22/02/2011 WEZYK, application No 27664/09 18/10/2010 VOIGT, application No 30618/09 30/11/2010 SZUMINSKI, application No 40463/09 14/12/2010 HOSZOWSKA, application No 40992/09 03/05/2011   Case, Application No. Date of decision     STRZYZEWSKI (II), application No 23118/10 02/11/2010 SZCZEPANSKI, application No 17182/10 08/03/2011 SARWA, application No 17170/10 08/03/2011 ANTONIAK, application No 15868/10 30/11/2010 WISNIEWSKI v, application No 15152/10 08/03/2011 KUCHARSKI, application No 14142/10 17/05/2011 DYGAS (II), application No 13415/10 14/09/2010 CYGAN, application No 10872/10 03/05/2011 BROZYNA, application No 6075/10 12/04/2011 WILKOJC, application No 2483/10 12/04/2011 LIPIEC, application No 514/10 29/03/2011 LASKOWSKI, application No 63397/09 23/11/2010 FINKE, application No 61406/09 18/10/2010 ZIMNY, application No 60407/09 05/10/2010 TKACZYK, application No 58051/09 02/11/2010 WODECKI, application No 50941/09 08/03/11 SZALECKI, application No 48598/09 22/02/2011 GASIOR, application No 47057/09 08/03/2011 ZIOLKOWSKI, application No 46826/09 07/09/2010 NITKOWSKI, application No 46176/09 06/07/2010 ORNAT, application No 45598/09 07/09/2010 BULATOWICZ, application No 43207/09 14/12/2010   [1] Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 8 March 2012 at the 1136th Meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies.