CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 2 décembre 2011

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sFB4D0E3C { font-size:8pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sF8AEFD1F { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s1A8C3523 { border:1pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s24215D7A { height:24.75pt } .s8413F217 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:1pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:1pt; padding-right:4.9pt; padding-left:4.9pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sA958D8CC { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:1pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:1pt; padding-right:4.9pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:middle } .s4F5B499 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:1pt; padding-right:4.9pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:middle } .sA6574500 { height:35.2pt } .s9983B581 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:1pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:1pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:1pt; padding-right:4.9pt; padding-left:4.9pt; vertical-align:middle } .s6D511073 { height:24pt } .sA3C14CAF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:1pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:1pt; padding-right:4.9pt; padding-left:4.9pt; vertical-align:middle } .s6754250E { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:1pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:1pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:1pt; padding-right:4.9pt; padding-left:4.9pt; vertical-align:middle } .s7D1C83F9 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:1pt; padding-right:4.9pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:middle } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .s846B54EF { font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)204 [1]   Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in 2 cases against Finland   (see below)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Having regard to the judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee once they had become final, and following the Court’s finding of violations of the Convention in these cases;   Having invited the government of the respondent state to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with its obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide by the judgments;   Having examined the information provided by the government in accordance with the Committee’s Rules for the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;   Having further satisfied itself that the respondent state paid the applicants the just satisfaction provided in the judgments,   DECLARES, in the light of the above that it has exercised its functions under Article   46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and   DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.         Information on the judgments in 2 cases against Finland     Application No. Case name Date of judgment Date of final judgment Decision to close 53678/00 Karhuvaara and Iltalehti 16/11/2004 16/02/2005 960 meeting March 2006 56767/00 Selisto 16/11/2004 16/02/2005 960 meeting March 2006     [1] Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 2 December 2011 at the 1128th Meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies