CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 27 juin 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s5FFF0A78 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s418B82EF { width:132.42pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 1209/16 GROMADSKA ORGANIZATSIYA YAKHT-KLUB BOREY against Ukraine The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 27 June 2024 as a Committee composed of:   Carlo Ranzoni , President ,   Mārtiņš Mits,   María Elósegui , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 16 December 2015, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Gromadska Organizatsiya Yakht-Klub Borey, is a non ‑ governmental organisation, located in Kyiv Region. The case concerns the applicant’s deprivation of a land plot it had owned and its transfer to a third party. In that respect the applicant complained under Article 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention. It also complained about the length of the proceedings in its case being in breach of the reasonable time requirement under Article 6 of the Convention. The Court’s attempts to reach the applicant and its representative by phone and via email as indicated in the application form were unsuccessful. The Court’s letter sent by registered post in January 2024 to the applicant’s address returned as undelivered. The letter sent to the representative’s address was delivered on 28 February 2024, but no reply has followed to date. The applicant has not contacted the Court since the date of lodging of the application. THE LAW In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application (see Bryska and Others v Ukraine [Committee] (dec.), nos. 11706/13 and 5 others, 2 November 2023, and Zhadan and Others v Ukraine [Committee] (dec.), no. 29283/13 and 26   others, 14 December 2023). Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. The Court reiterates that under Article 37 § 2 of the Convention it may decide to restore an application to its list of cases if it considers that the circumstances justify such a course. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 18 July 2024.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Carlo Ranzoni   Acting Deputy Registrar   President