CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG25
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 18 avril 2024
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0418DEC003909820
- Date
- 18 avril 2024
- Publication
- 18 avril 2024
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .s8E0918A8 { width:37.55pt; display:inline-block } .s908C35FA { width:156.77pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s2F3EB0E4 { border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sE1A7A04C { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#424242 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sCC7380B3 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#424242 } .sAB95A5CB { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#424242 } .sBAADFE8C { border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 39098/20 Dezső HORVÁTH against Hungary and 10 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 18   April   2024 as a Committee composed of:   Gilberto Felici , President ,   Péter Paczolay,   Raffaele Sabato , judges , and Attila Teplán, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants and their representative is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). Additional complaints based on the same facts – in particular, that in the specific cases of the applicants no effective domestic remedy was available in regard to the inadequate prison conditions – were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above ‑ mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 16 May 2024.     Attila Teplán   Gilberto Felici   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     39098/20 25/08/2020 Dezső HORVÁTH 1969 Kovács Arthur Szeged Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 22/03/2024 19/12/2023 13,400     40050/20 18/08/2020 Gábor BALOGH 1977 Kovács Arthur Szeged Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 22/03/2024 18/03/2024 11,900     42406/20 11/09/2020 Ferenc KÁNYA 1977 Kovács Arthur Szeged Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 22/03/2024 19/03/2024 16,300     42483/20 10/09/2020 István KOLOMPÁR 1981     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 22/03/2024 06/03/2024 5,900     46193/20 06/10/2020 János ILLINGER 1974 Kovács Arthur Szeged Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 22/03/2024 19/12/2023 16,300     46800/20 07/10/2020 János FARAGÓ 1991 Kovács Arthur Szeged Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 22/03/2024 07/01/2024 4,500     48894/20 21/10/2020 István KESZTHELYI 1971 Kovács Arthur Szeged Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 22/03/2024 29/02/2024 16,300     54008/20 13/10/2020 László HALÁSZ 1973 Fónagy Gergely Budapest   22/03/2024 10/01/2024 3,000     54295/20 12/11/2020 Mihály BÓDI 1971 Kovács Arthur Szeged Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 22/03/2024 18/03/2024 2,300   18974/21 21/03/2021 Róbert GYENEI 1982 Kovács Arthur Szeged Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 22/03/2024 18/03/2024 6,900   55955/21 26/10/2021 Ottó Zsolt GYENGE 1978 Karsai Dániel András Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 22/03/2024 23/01/2024 16,300   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 25
- Date
- 18 avril 2024
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0418DEC003909820
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral