CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 18 avril 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .s8E0918A8 { width:37.55pt; display:inline-block } .s908C35FA { width:156.77pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sE3DA80B3 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 33026/20 Zsolt LÁZÁR against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 18   April   2024 as a Committee composed of:   Gilberto Felici , President ,   Péter Paczolay,   Raffaele Sabato , judges , and Attila Teplán, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants were represented by Mr A. Kovács, a lawyer practising in Szeged. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). Additional complaints based on the same facts – in particular, that in the specific cases of the applicants no effective domestic remedy was available in regard to the inadequate prison conditions – were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 16 May 2024.     Attila Teplán   Gilberto Felici   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     33026/20 21/07/2020 Zsolt LÁZÁR 1974 Kovács Arthur Szeged Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 22/03/2024 29/02/2024 16,300     40280/20 03/09/2020 Zsolt RADICS 1980 Kovács Arthur Szeged Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 22/03/2024 29/02/2024 7,700     45837/20 07/10/2020 Ferenc PULYA 1965 Kovács Arthur Szeged Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 22/03/2024 07/01/2024 6,700     45840/20 07/10/2020 Imre László RENDEK 1976 Kovács Arthur Szeged Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 22/03/2024 29/02/2024 16,300     48910/20 28/10/2020 József LAKATOS 1962 Kovács Arthur Szeged Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 22/03/2024 05/12/2023 16,300     53546/20 12/11/2020 Zoltán MUST 1981 Kovács Arthur Szeged Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 22/03/2024 02/12/2023 16,300     55605/20 26/11/2020 Goran RADIVOJEVIC 1965 Kovács Arthur Szeged Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 22/03/2024 02/12/2023 5,400     20475/21 06/04/2021 Elek TACZMAN 1984 Kovács Arthur Szeged Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 22/03/2024 20/12/2023 14,300     20984/21 06/04/2021 Zoltán MAKULA 1980 Kovács Arthur Szeged Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 22/03/2024 19/03/2024 5,500   21289/21 13/04/2021 Zsolt SERÉNYI 1969 Kovács Arthur Szeged Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 22/03/2024 20/12/2023 5,300   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.