CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 18 janvier 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s22DFA96B { width:28.86pt; display:inline-block } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC5599237 { width:142.72pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s3DF5EF88 { width:128.75pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s598389F7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 55960/18 Vladimir Vladimirovich ZHILKIN against Russia and 6 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 18   January 2024 as a Committee composed of:   Peeter Roosma , President ,   Ioannis Ktistakis,   Andreas Zünd , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is provided in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Articles 10 and 11 of the Convention, concerning their convictions for participating in the activities of “undesirable organisations”, were communicated to the Russian Government. By letters sent on 2 June and 26 July 2023, through the Court’s Electronic Communication Service (eComms), the applicants were informed that the period allowed for submitting their observations had expired on 26 May 2023, and that no time extension had been requested. The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. However, no response has been received to date. THE LAW In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applications. Accordingly, the cases should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 8 February 2024.   {signature_p_1}   {signature_p_2}   Viktoriya Maradudina   Peeter Roosma   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX   No. Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality Represented by 1. 55960/18 Zhilkin v. Russia 15/11/2018 Vladimir Vladimirovich ZHILKIN 1974 Tambov Russian Dmitriy Eduardovich PYATAKHIN 2. 16258/19 Kladovoy v. Russia 11/03/2019 Nikolay Igorevich KLADOVOY 1965 Rostov-on-Don Russian   3. 31123/19 Zenina v. Russia 21/05/2019 Olga Alekseyevna ZENINA 1952 Rostov-on-Don Russian Irina Aleksandrovna YATSENKO 4. 33187/19 Zenina v. Russia 04/06/2019 Irina Alekseyevna ZENINA 1952 Rostov-on-Don Russian Irina Aleksandrovna YATSENKO 5. 48765/19 Zaytsev v. Russia 16/09/2019 Roman Olegovich ZAYTSEV 1989 Volgograd Russian Aleksey Aleksandrovich PRYANISHNIKOV   6. 62516/19 Savelyev v. Russia 19/11/2019 Aleksandr Valeryevich SAVELYEV 1996 Nekrasovskaya Russian   7. 33360/21 Shaposhnikov v.   Russia 04/06/2021 Yuriy Yuryevich SHAPOSHNIKOV 1987 Nizhniy Novgorod Russian Aleksey Alekseyevich VETOSHKIN