CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG28
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 17 mai 2023
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0517DEC008129017
- Date
- 17 mai 2023
- Publication
- 17 mai 2023
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .sF5DDD244 { width:144.1pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s1BF56575 { height:34.55pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 81290/17 Frusin TOMA against Romania and 6 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 17   May   2023 as a Committee composed of:   Tim Eicke , President ,   Branko Lubarda,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations (see the appended table for the relevant dates). No reply was received by the Court. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired. The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court (see details in the appended table) and there are no previous letters from the applicants informing the Court about a change of address. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article 37 §   1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 §   1 in   fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 8 June 2023.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Tim Eicke   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court Date of sending Government’s observations to the applicant Time limit of submission of response by the applicant Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt/return of the registered letter Date of the applicant’s release from prison     81290/17 22/11/2017 Frusin TOMA 1962   Anișoara Stan Bucharest 29/11/2017 27/06/2022 08/08/2022 21/11/2022 06/12/2022 Letter handed over to the applicant’s representative (according to information on the website of the Romanian Post)   27/01/2023 The registered letter sent also to the applicant’s address mentioned in the application form returned to sender as “unclaimed”.   24/05/2017     16609/18 02/04/2018 Floricel ACHIM 1968   Ioana Achim Bucharest 07/07/2022 27/07/2022 07/09/2022 26/09/2022 12/12/2022 Letter returned to sender as “unclaimed” 04/10/2017     18254/18 09/04/2018 Karl Bernhard KNABE 1965       24/05/2018 11/08/2022 22/09/2022 19/10/2022 28/11/2022 Letter returned to sender as “recipient unknown at the address”   24/10/2017     21069/18 23/04/2018 Viorel POP 1982       09/05/2022 11/08/2022 22/09/2022 19/10/2022 07/11/2022 Signed by the applicant 24/10/2017     22479/18 07/05/2018 Mihaiță COMAN 1988       07/04/2022 11/08/2022 22/09/2022 19/10/2022 31/10/2022 Letter handed over to the recipient (according to the information on the website of the Romanian Post)   07/11/2017     35472/19 22/08/2019 Ioan ZOLTAN 1976       19/05/2022 11/08/2022 22/09/2022 19/10/2022 03/11/2022 Signed by the applicant 14/12/2019     13605/20 01/04/2020 Marius DUMITRU 1989       10/11/2020 25/03/2021 23/09/2021 12/08/2021 04/02/2022 01/08/2022 03/10/2022   The four registered letters were handed over to the local mailman on 23/08/2021, 11/02/2022, 08/08/2022, 10/10/2022. 02/11/2020  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 28
- Date
- 17 mai 2023
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0517DEC008129017
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral