CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 9 septembre 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s241E80BF { width:7.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s2785BC08 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sB5B1C99F { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sD35D798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .sF057D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:6pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 9594/18 Dmitriy Valeryevich DOMYSHEV against Russia and 17 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 9   September 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Darian Pavli, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Peeter Roosma, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 8 § 1 of the Convention concerning the allocation or transfer to a remote penal facility irrespective of family life considerations were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Russia in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 30 September 2021.   {signature_p_2}   Viktoriya Maradudina   Darian Pavli   Acting Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   8 § 1 of the Convention (allocation or transfer to a remote penal facility irrespective of family life considerations) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant/household (in euros) [1]     9594/18 19/09/2018 Dmitriy Valeryevich DOMYSHEV 1991     Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport by van on several occasions between 19/07/2019 and 17/01/2020; 0.3   sq. m. of personal space; lack of or insufficient natural light, overcrowding, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to potable water;   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - conditions of detention in IK-5 Krasnoyarsk Region since 02/04/2020; 2 sq. m. of personal space; lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air;   Art. 8 (1) - permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities - in IK-5 Krasnoyarsk Region, since 02/04/2020; video surveillance by opposite-sex operators;   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities, inadequate conditions of detention during transport, allocation to a remote detention facility and inadequate conditions of detention 15/06/2021 14/04/2021 7,800     53991/18 27/12/2018 Yuriy Vyacheslavovich SHELUKHA 1987       Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility 22/09/2020 17/05/2021 6,000     28788/19 09/05/2019   AND   3769/20 20/12/2019 Household Yevgeniy Vitalyevich SIMUSEV 1981   Antonina Petrovna SIMUSEVA 1949     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility and in respect of inadequate conditions of detention;     Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - detention of the applicant in IK-8 Komi Republic since 29/03/2018; lack of toiletries, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to warm water, poor quality of food, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, sharing cells with inmates infected with contagious disease, lack of requisite medical assistance 29/04/2021 03/06/2021     14/06/2021 7,800     47766/19 12/08/2020 Zaza Zazayevich SADZHAYA 1986     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility;   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - detention in IK-5 Krasnoyarsk Region, since 28/11/2016; 2.6 sq. m. of personal space; overcrowding, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to shower 03/03/2021 18/06/2021 7,800     64411/19 30/11/2019 Household Vladimir Vladimirovich BRONZ 1990   Tatiana Igoryevna BRONZ 1992       20/05/2021 03/06/2021 6,000     2271/20 20/12/2019 Dmitriy Vladislavovich LUNEV 1978         Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility 07/12/2020 14/06/2021 6,000     30922/20 19/05/2020 Yuriy Vladimirovich SUSHNENKOV 1973     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility 15/02/2021 07/06/2021 6,000     41384/20 24/08/2020   AND   51161/20 17/10/2020 Household Svetlana Sabirovna KHEYNONEN 1959   Mikhail Sergeyevich YEFREMOV 1984     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility 15/06/2021 17/05/2021 6,000     41388/20 24/08/2020   AND   51633/20 17/10/2020 Household Andrey Anatolyevich SOTNIKOV 1978   Yelena Alekseyevna SOTNIKOVA 1978         15/06/2021 08/04/2021 6,000   49553/20 01/10/2020 Pavel Sergeyevich GOLUBEV 1986     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility 15/06/2021 07/04/2021 6,000   52306/20 25/10/2020 Tatyana Yuryevna KHOLODKOVA 1994       Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility 15/06/2021 08/04/2021 6,000   52542/20 09/11/2020 Viktor Anatolyevich VORONTSOV 1966       15/06/2021 08/04/2021 6,000   53825/20 19/11/2020 Vladimir Aleksandrovich SMIRNOV 1984     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility 15/06/2021 08/04/2021 6,000   54343/20 19/11/2020 Denis Anatolyevich BUZKO 1976       15/06/2021 15/04/2021 6,000   54649/20 27/11/2020 Andrey Borisovich SAMOKHIN 1974 Yevenko Alla Borisovna Novokuznetsk Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote detention facility 15/06/2021 23/04/2021 6,000   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.