CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 17 décembre 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s58699FB5 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sA3A61D5F { width:158.44pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s2785BC08 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sB5B1C99F { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sD35D798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 66420/17 Alina Anatolyevna YEMELYANOVA and Others against Russia and 7 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 17   December 2020 as a Committee composed of:   Darian Pavli, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Peeter Roosma, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 8 of the Convention concerning the allocation or transfer to a remote penal facility irrespective of family life considerations were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention (see the appended table). The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Russia in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list on the basis of the friendly settlement. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 21 January 2021.   {signature_p_2}   Liv Tigerstedt   Darian Pavli   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   8 of the Convention (allocation or transfer to a remote penal facility irrespective of family life considerations) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant/household (in euros) [1]     66420/17 01/09/2017 (4 applicants) Household Alina Anatolyevna YEMELYANOVA 1995 Aleksandr Semenovich YEMELYANOV 2016 Mikhail Semenovich YEMELYANOV 2013 Semen Vladimirovich YEMELYANOV 1994 Kogan Vanessa Moscow Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention - poor conditions of detention in KP-48 Krasnoyarsk Region: no or restricted access to toilet, poor quality of food, lack of fresh food, lack or insufficient quantity of food.,   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of allocation to a remote facility 20/05/2020 11/11/2020 7,800     11862/18 23/01/2018 Vladimir Petrovich GIMBATOV 1978     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote facility 03/07/2020 23/10/2020 6,000     18030/18 20/03/2018 Vyacheslav Vyacheslavovich KOLGIN 1978 Yefremova Yekaterina Viktorovna Moscow Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport - and in respect of allocation to a remote colony and permanent video surveillance,   Art. 8 (1) - permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities - IZ-1 Yekaterinburg 06/07/2018 IZ-1 Novosibirsk 08/07/2018-10/07/2018 IZ-1 Irkutsk 13/07/2018-21/07/2018 IZ-1 Chita 22/07/2018-24/07/2018 IZ-1 Khabarovsk 27/07/2018-21/10/2018,   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - 06/07/2018-27/07/2018 no or restricted access to toilet, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack or insufficient quantity of food, lack of fresh air 09/10/2020 05/11/2020 7,000     46993/19 14/08/2019 Movsar Salmanovich IZHAYEV 1983     Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - 29/08/2019-03/11/2019 (several instances of transportation by van and train), no belts and handles, lack of fresh air, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light,   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport - and in respect of allocation to a remote colony 09/10/2020 17/11/2020 7,000     6820/20 17/03/2020 Beslan Vakhidovich GADAYEV 1982     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote correctional colony 09/10/2020 05/11/2020 6,000     15071/20 11/03/2020 (3 applicants) Household Oleg Konstantinovich RAZUVAYEV 1957 Danil Olegovich RAZUVAYEV 2005 Olga Viktorovna RAZUVAYEVA 1976 Miller Irina Vladimirovna Kansk Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 27/10/2020 12/11/2020 6,000     15080/20 21/02/2020 Roman Aleksandrovich AKSENOV 1975       27/10/2020 16/11/2020 6,000     15108/20 11/03/2020 Household Pavel Vladimirovich AKATOV 1991 Vera Gennadyevna MALYUTINA 1955 Miller Irina Vladimirovna Kansk Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote correctional colony 27/10/2020 12/11/2020 6,000   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.