CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 19 novembre 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s94C6321B { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:left; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6E03D265 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sD7AA71C8 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sA3A61D5F { width:158.44pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s2785BC08 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sB5B1C99F { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sD35D798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s26F67D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:3pt } .sC4A1E089 { height:70.15pt } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 26083/07 Yuriy Kharitonovich ALEKSANDROV against Russia and 31 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 19   November 2020 as a Committee composed of:   Darian Pavli, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Peeter Roosma, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 8 of the Convention concerning the allocation or transfer to a remote penal facility irrespective of family life considerations were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Russia in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 10 December 2020.   Liv Tigerstedt   Darian Pavli   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   8 of the Convention (allocation or transfer to a remote penal facility irrespective of family life considerations) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant/ household (in euros) [1]     26083/07 11/05/2007 Yuriy Kharitonovich ALEKSANDROV 1966 Markov Eduard Valentinovich Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote facility. 25/09/2020 16/09/2020 6,000     21333/13 25/02/2013 Nelli Fedorovna BYKOVTSEVA 1938 Buzunov Aleksandr Aleksandrovich Voronezh   25/09/2020 16/09/2020 6,000     70804/17 09/08/2017 Rashid Bekmurzayevich IBRAGIMOV 1986     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 03/09/2020 22/09/2020 6,000     71069/17 12/09/2017 Nikolay Nikolayevich BORISENKO 1973     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony;   Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - Detention in a metal cage during the trial hearings held in the courtroom of the Zabaykalskiy Regional Court from 13/04/2017 to 22/06/2017; conviction on 06/07/2017. 03/09/2020 09/09/2020 9,750     72220/17 10/01/2017 Roman Grigoryevich ANTIPIN 1977     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 22/09/2020 02/07/2020 6,000     76496/17 16/04/2018 Vladimir Ivanovich GOLBAN 1962       18/09/2020 15/07/2020 6,000     81707/17 07/11/2017 Vyacheslav Anatolyevich BABKOV 1987     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 18/09/2020 01/07/2020 6,000     82246/17 26/01/2018 Yuriy Vasilyevich BABICH 1977     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention;   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - detention in IK-8 Komi Republic since 01/04/2018 and pending; 2 sq. m of personal space; infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of fresh air. 09/10/2020 16/09/2020 10,500     24241/18 23/04/2018   and   22562/19 11/04/2019 Household Igor Yevgenyevich GORLOV 1965   Alla Vasilyevna GORLOVA 1942     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 03/09/2020 28/10/2020 6,000   31543/18 18/06/2018 Vasiliy Vasilyevich ERYUKOV 1979     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony;   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - between the detention facilities on 07/05/2019-08/05/2019 and on 17/05/2019 (overcrowding, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, inadequate temperature, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of fresh air, lack of safety equipment). 27/10/2020 19/08/2020 7,800   32600/18 22/06/2018 Vladimir Nikolayevich GOLOSENKO 1967     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony.   18/09/2020 08/07/2020 6,000   35062/18 20/08/2018 Oleg Leonidovich ARTEMENKOV 1967     Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport by van on 13/06/2019 for 7 hours; restricted access to toilet and potable water; inadequate temperature. 09/10/2020 30/07/2020 6,000   37219/18 21/07/2018 Household Svetlana Valeryevna ISTOMINA 1986 Svetlana Vladimirovna ISTOMINA 1965 Govorukhina Tatyana Valentinovna Moscoe Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote facility. 09/10/2020 15/10/2020 6,000   37601/18 17/12/2018 Vladimir Nikolayevich ANISIMOV 1968     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 18/09/2020 10/07/2020 6,000   46385/18 19/09/2018 Azamat Valeryevich IKAYEV 1980       03/09/2020 17/09/2020 6,000   52393/18 22/09/2018 Alena Gennadyevna ISAKOVA 1973       18/09/2020 01/07/2020 6,000   59377/18 05/12/2018 Oleg Yuryevich BOCHAROV 1981     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - the applicant was transported by train and van on 16-17/05/2019; 0.5 sq. m of personal space; insufficient number of sleeping places. 22/09/2020 26/06/2020 7,800   3621/19 28/12/2018 Aleksey Sergeyevich BEZBORODOV 1985 Egle Denis Sergeyevich Krasnoyarsk Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony.     27/10/2020 20/10/2020 6,000   15541/19 01/03/2019 Oksana Timofeyevna BORSUK 1982       18/09/2020 19/08/2020 6,000   15837/19 05/08/2019 Vladimir Vladimirovich ABRAMOV 1968     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 18/09/2020 15/07/2020 6,000   25288/19 26/06/2019 Ivan Vladimirovich FALKOV 1985       20/10/2020 07/08/2020 6,000   30365/19 23/05/2019 Dmitriy Igorevich GOLUBEV 1990     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 18/09/2020 23/07/2020 6,000   31954/19 03/06/2019 Kadriya Karimovna ABDULLINA 1960     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 18/09/2020 29/07/2020 6,000   45497/19 30/09/2019 Dmitriy Anatolyevich ASTAFYEV 1978     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 20/10/2020 24/08/2020 6,000   48343/19 05/09/2019 (4 applicants) Household Beslan Savarbekovich BALAYEV 1983 Zabaydat Osmanovna AUSHEVA 1961 Indira Magomed-Saliyevna TIMIYEVA 1993 Yasmina Beslanovna TIMIYEVA 2017       Sergeyeva Irina Vadimovna Moscow Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 09/10/2020 24/08/2020 6,000   61885/19 18/12/2019 Aleksandr Vladilenovich GETMANTSEV 1989     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - and in respect of allocation to a remote colony;   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - detention in IK-24 Komi Republic from 25/01/2018 to 02/09/2019, 2 sq. m of personal space; overcrowding, bunk beds, mouldy or dirty cell. 27/10/2020 09/09/2020 7,800   63568/19 14/11/2019 Nikolay Oganesovich ARUTYUNYAN 1980       20/10/2020 26/08/2020 6,000   6496/20 15/01/2020 Denis Sergeyevich FOKIN 1982 Korneyev Aleksey Igorevich Bryansk Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention;   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - detention in IK-5 Kirov Region from 13/11/2018 to 19/11/2019; less than 3 sq. m of personal space; overcrowding; poor quality of food. 27/10/2020 26/08/2020 7,800   17216/20 09/03/2020 Andrey Aleksandrovich DANILOV 1992       27/10/2020 17/08/2020 6,000   19516/20 17/03/2020 Olga Vladimirovna CHEKULDAYEVA 1958     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in respect of allocation to a remote colony. 27/10/2020 11/09/2020 6,000   20338/20 24/04/2020 Vasiliy Nikolayevich CHIVKIN 1966       27/10/2020 21/08/2020 6,000   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.