CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 4 avril 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s98AB28CD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:left; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sEEEC397 { width:146.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sC36A6361 { font-family:Arial; color:#000000 }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 11567/17 Aleksey Leonidovich YUDENKOV against Russia and 13 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 4   April 2019 as a Committee composed of:   Alena Poláčková, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Jolien Schukking, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicants’ replies to these declarations, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under Article 13 of the Convention. The Government submitted declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention. In some of the applications, they further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants’ rights guaranteed by Article 13 of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article   37 §   1   (c) of the Convention. The amounts would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declarations. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court finds that, following the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declarations made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties. It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 9 May 2019.   Liv Tigerstedt   Alena Poláčková   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of applicant’s acceptance Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     11567/17 30/12/2016 Aleksey Leonidovich Yudenkov 11/02/1994 Zlomnov Mikhail Andreyevich St Petersburg Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 14/07/2017 11/09/2017 3,555     26125/17 21/03/2017 Sergey Nikolayevich Bolbikov 27/04/1969 Zlobin Sergey Vladimirovich Moscow   17/10/2017 15/12/2017 5,000     26961/17 01/03/2017 Vyacheslav Gennadyevich Gorbachev 18/09/1965       17/10/2017 11/12/2017 11,000     27465/17 17/03/2017 Salikh Borisovich Temirbulatov 25/01/1973     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 17/10/2017 04/01/2018 4,935     33264/17 15/09/2017 Vitaliy Vladimirovich Galkin 07/11/1998     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 03/04/2018 29/05/2018 2,460     41590/17 24/05/2017 Denis Vadimovich Chkhitauri 06/10/1986 Belinskaya Marina Aleksandrovna St Petersburg Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 13/02/2018 20/04/2018 8,500     73785/17 25/09/2017 Aleksey Yuryevich Sevizdral 05/04/1987     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 03/04/2018 06/06/2018 7,500     77193/17 10/01/2018 Vadim Viktorovich Teterkin 29/11/1970       10/09/2018 26/11/2018 2,095     82423/17 13/11/2017 Igor Aleksandrovich Stasyuk 23/02/1976       16/07/2018 04/09/2018 5,250   2381/18 06/12/2017 Vladimir Aleksandrovich Nikolayev 08/08/1983     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 16/07/2018 11/09/2018 6,000   7506/18 11/01/2018 Dmitriy Nikolayevich Babayev 14/04/1997 Ivanova Natalya Vladimirovna St Petersburg Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 10/09/2018 27/11/2018 2,825   7662/18 25/01/2018 Artem Anatolyevich Losev 19/12/1990 Orlov Andrey Stanislavovich St Petersburg Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 10/09/2018 26/11/2018 6,975   21504/18 19/04/2018 Galina Arsenovna Grancha 23/02/1997 Murashkin Igor Gennadyevich St Petersburg Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 29/10/2018 15/01/2019 3,190   21686/18 19/04/2018 Denis Giviyevich Adamov 24/09/1994 Urlashov Aleksey Mikhaylovich St Petersburg Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 29/10/2018 09/01/2019 5,250   [1] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.