CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 31 janvier 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sE174D402 { width:142.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 40159/16 Lajos MÓROCZ against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 31   January 2019 as a Committee composed of:   Georges Ravarani, President,   Marko Bošnjak,   Péter Paczolay, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 21 February 2019.   Liv Tigerstedt   Georges Ravarani   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (excessive length of civil proceedings)   No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth / Date of registration Representative’s name and location Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant/ household (in euros)     40159/16 04/07/2016 Lajos Mórocz 23/10/1976 Farkas Sándor Hévíz 06/12/2018 22/06/2018 3,900     40622/16 06/07/2016   Sat-Rol Kft 20/06/2001 Kodela Viktor Budapest 10/12/2018 25/09/2018 2,000     42901/16 18/07/2016 Tamas Gyorgy Partos 20/09/1954 Váczi Péter Győr 10/12/2018 13/08/2018 3,000     43775/16 30/06/2016 Csaba Károly Tichy-Rács 09/03/1944     10/12/2018 26/06/2018 3,000     45300/16 28/07/2016 Piroska Schreinné Kovács 17/03/1956 László SCHREIN 03/05/1941 Gaudi-Nagy Tamás Budapest 10/12/2018 22/06/2018 2,000     47756/16 05/08/2016 (27 applicants) Household Géza Kálózi 04/11/1958 Gezane Kalozi 03/02/1958     Mihalyne Boldizsar 08/08/1960   Imre Kalozi 10/06/1957 Mihaly Marussi 18/09/1958   Jozsef Nemeth 13/07/1943   Jozsef Nemeth 13/05/1968   Palne Supka 27/03/1943   Household Istvan Szabo 20/06/1971 Anita Szabone Gortva 02/01/1976   Household Jozsef Romfa 24/10/1940 Jozsefne Romfa 26/09/1944   Household Pal Tompai 10/05/1957 Palne Tompai 10/11/1963   Household Laszlo Kocsis 04/05/1962 Laszlone Kocsis 11/09/1963   Household Attila Nemeth 25/02/1970 Attilane Nemeth 25/07/1975   Household Gyorgy Zseller 19/04/1953 Gyorgyne Zseller 04/09/1955   Household Helga Csenki 06/01/1989 Palne Csenki 22/12/1966 Szabina Csenki 20/01/1999 Tamas Csenki 16/07/1985   Household Laszlo Benyei 25/08/1956 Laszlone Benyei 30/03/1933 Jozsefne Parej 22/02/1953 Kecskés Ákos Zoltán Hódmezővásárhely 05/12/2018 25/09/2018 1,100     48391/16 01/08/2016 Ferenc József Likvacsán 25/01/1954 Sebők Dóra Budapest 06/12/2018 09/08/2018 8,000     67938/16 16/11/2016 Zoltán Pallagi 20/08/1972 Kővári Béla Budapest 18/12/2018 27/09/2018 5,000     68037/16 07/11/2016 Gábor Jéga Szabó 27/11/1952 Kincses István András Orosháza 10/12/2018 28/08/2018 4,000   77139/16 05/12/2016 András Bence Jávor 04/08/1979     17/12/2018 17/09/2018 2,000