CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 31 janvier 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sE174D402 { width:142.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sC36A6361 { font-family:Arial; color:#000000 } .sB853CD26 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 9841/16 Rita Ibolya DÉVAI and Rita BERKI against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 31   January 2019 as a Committee composed of:   Georges Ravarani, President,   Marko Bošnjak,   Péter Paczolay, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 21 February 2019.   Liv Tigerstedt   Georges Ravarani   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (excessive length of civil proceedings)   No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth / Date of registration Representative’s name and location Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant/household (in euros) [1]     9841/16 18/12/2015 Household Rita Ibolya Dévai 29/11/1969 Rita Berki 22/08/1987   Molnár László Sándor Budapest 13/12/2018 11/04/2018 3,000     10105/16 16/02/2016 Zoltánné Galambos 01/12/1951 Váczi Péter Győr 06/12/2018 24/04/2018 3,000     17548/16 30/03/2016 István Lafferton 20/07/1950     13/12/2018 26/04/2018 6,000     46199/16 05/08/2016 (26 applicants) József Koncz 14/01/1963 Jeno Buzder 13/10/1958 Illesne Horvath 17/01/1954 Istvanne Horvath 16/09/1955   Mihalyne Onodi 08/07/1938 Karoly Rozman 23/05/1958 Janos Tarjanyi 30/12/1953   Household Istvan Nyilas 29/01/1959 Istvanne Nyilas 17/07/1966   Household Zoltanne Pozsar 12/05/1964 Karolyne Rozman 14/04/1940   Household Antalne Farkas 04/09/1952 Istvan Hekkel 30/12/1966   Household Jozsef Szatmari 24/11/1955 Jozsefne Szatmari 29/09/1955       Household Jozsef Gurbo 06/08/1952 Mihalyne Gurbo 31/01/1927 Zsolt Gurbo 19/03/1985   Household Jozsef Balanyi 07/11/1952 Sandor Balanyi 27/09/1951 Janosne Hlavacs 19/02/1948 Laszlone Lantos 04/03/1950   Household Denes Gellert Pall 09/03/1977 Eszter Aniko Pallne Dako 27/12/1980   Household Istvan Bertalan Babar 13/11/1952 Istvan Bertalanne Babar 13/09/1953   Kecskés Ákos Zoltán Hódmezővásárhely 21/12/2018 25/09/2018 1,100     48516/16 09/08/2016 Attila Kiss 27/07/1960     03/01/2019 26/06/2018 2,000     51833/16 30/08/2016 Zsolt Farkas 04/01/1983 Mester Csaba Budapest 27/11/2018 11/10/2018 2,000     59051/16 04/10/2016 (4 applicants) Household Imre Bencze 22/07/1950 Atlasz Építőipari Kft Imréné Bencze 07/04/1955 Tünde Katalin Bencze 24/09/1977   Béres Norbert Budapest 10/12/2018 02/10/2018 800     69208/16 10/11/2016 Vilmos Csordás 28/07/1967 Váczi Péter Győr 10/12/2018 13/08/2018 3,000     73633/16 23/11/2016 Zoltán Ferenczy 01/04/1964 Erdőné Rigó Ágnes Budapest 10/12/2018 20/09/2018 3,300   73643/16 18/11/2016 Frekvent KfT. 05/04/1991       11/12/2018 03/07/2018 7,000   [1] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.