CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 20 novembre 2018

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s2DED9654 { width:26.12pt; display:inline-block } .s2737C6CF { width:157.76pt; display:inline-block } .sAFF36EC2 { width:18.78pt; display:inline-block } .s1B61D60 { width:156.43pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s8F670191 { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; list-style-position:inside } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s4EFEAD { width:14.32pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block }     SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 74289/10 Destine GÜVEN against Turkey and 9 other applications (see list appended)   The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 20   November 2018 as a Committee composed of:   Ledi Bianku, President,   Jon Fridrik Kjølbro,   Ivana Jelić, judges, and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE 1.     A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. 2.     The applicants’ complaints under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 were communicated to the Turkish Government (“the Government”), who were represented by their Agent. 3.     On 19 March 2018 the Government submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits of the applications. 4.     Following the applicants’ failure to submit their observations within the time-limit, on 17 July 2018 another letter was sent to them by the Registry, reminding them that the period allowed for submission of their observations in reply had expired on 11 May 2018 and that no extension of time had been requested. Their attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention. 5.     The applicants failed to respond to the last letter of the Registry, which had been received by their representative on 25 July 2018. THE LAW 6.     Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. 7.     The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue their applications, within the meaning of Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37   §   1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the cases. 8.     In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 13 December 2018.   Hasan Bakırcı   Ledi Bianku   Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX   No. Application no. Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence Represented by   74289/10 05/11/2010 Destine GÜVEN 11/04/1965 İZMİR   Hüseyin Ali AFŞAROĞLU   75443/10 05/11/2010 Emrah DOĞAN 04/01/1980 ŞANLIURFA   Hüseyin Ali AFŞAROĞLU   75444/10 05/11/2010 Hediye Berdan GÜVEN 01/04/1957 İZMİR   Hüseyin Ali AFŞAROĞLU   75445/10 05/11/2010 Nesrin BİLGİÇ 21/11/1957 ŞANLIURFA   Hüseyin Ali AFŞAROĞLU   75446/10 05/11/2010 Fatma DOĞAN 24/08/1943 ŞANLIURFA   Hüseyin Ali AFŞAROĞLU   45105/11 07/07/2011 Hüseyin Coşkun GÜVEN 29/07/1958 İZMİR   Hüseyin Ali AFŞAROĞLU   47654/11 13/06/2011 Hanife Sibel KURTIŞ (GÜVEN) 05/07/1959 İZMİR   Hüseyin Ali AFŞAROĞLU   58096/11 07/07/2011 Oya DOĞAN 15/06/1975 ŞANLIURFA   Hüseyin Ali AFŞAROĞLU   58103/11 07/07/2011 Hüseyin Berker GÜVEN 07/09/1994 İZMİR   Hüseyin Ali AFŞAROĞLU             62277/11 20/06/2011 Ayşe Büge GÜVEN 20/04/1988 İZMİR   Hüseyin Ali AFŞAROĞLU