CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 25 octobre 2018

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s354F7CEB { width:27.79pt; display:inline-block } .sE174D402 { width:142.09pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sC36A6361 { font-family:Arial; color:#000000 } .sB853CD26 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 5710/16 Miklós KONDRÁT and Miklósné KONDRÁT against Hungary and 11 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 25   October 2018 as a Committee composed of:   Georges Ravarani, President,   Marko Bošnjak,   Péter Paczolay, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 15 November 2018.   Liv Tigerstedt   Georges Ravarani   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX   No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of the Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant/household (in euros) [1]     5710/16 21/01/2016 Household Miklós Kondrát 13/07/1930 Miklósné Kondrát 13/07/1930   Vágó Péter Miskolc   18/09/2018 14/05/2018 2,000     6294/16 26/01/2016 Zoltán Horváth 25/01/1972 Kmetty Ildikó Vác     05/09/2018 22/06/2018 3,000     13788/16 04/03/2016 (7 applicants) Károly László Zsombor 09/07/1937 Antal Urgyán 02/10/1968 Miklósné Turák 07/11/1946 Péterné Tőke 23/01/1939 István Horváth 21/09/1947 Sándor Végső 12/04/1941 Mihály Gyorgyné Breier 03/12/1956   Kiss Dániel Bálint Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings - 13/09/2018 17/04/2018 12,000     17644/16 17/03/2016 Lászlóné Jurás 06/08/1947   Váczi Péter Győr   13/09/2018 19/04/2018 3,000     22635/16 15/04/2016 József Andrásné Budi 22/02/1958   Karsai Dániel András Budapest   07/09/2018 27/04/2018 5,200     23414/16 21/04/2016 Balázs György Rágyánszki 19/10/1973   Mester Csaba Budapest   19/09/2018 19/07/2018 7,000     26684/16 29/04/2016 Balázs Németh 17/11/1988   Bese Julianna Tatabánya   18/09/2018 24/04/2018 1,300     53149/16 05/09/2016 Margit Anna Jófejűné Pápai 16/02/1952   Sebők Dóra Budapest   06/09/2018 17/08/2018 2,500     57251/16 26/09/2016 Zoltán Pósa 23/01/1976 Karsai Dániel András Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings - 12/09/2018 20/06/2018 1,300   61289/16 14/10/2016 István Tihanyi 19/10/1954   Szegedi Zsolt Nyíregyháza   17/09/2018 13/09/2018 12,000   24422/17 23/03/2017 (5 applicants) Józsefné Held 22/02/1933 Józsefné Held 19/08/1960   Household Anita Held 01/02/1984 Péter Held 02/05/1957 Renáta Held 21/09/1986 Tóth István Budapest   07/09/2018 29/08/2018 10,000   76332/17 19/07/2013 (10 applicants) Istvan Petrik 20/07/1971 Gábor Dömsödi 23/05/1947 Csaba Hertelendi 06/07/1959 Gergely Jánosi 08/07/1965 József Elek 12/03/1953 András Farkas 13/05/1954 Tamás Rácz 11/08/1975 Csaba Molnár 06/02/1976 Lajos Balogh 30/06/1964 Imre Szántó 30/09/1966 Barbalics István Budapest   13/09/2018 11/04/2018 10,000   [1] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.