CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 24 mai 2018

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sFD94178 { width:13.64pt; display:inline-block } .s7E12FC16 { width:173.31pt; display:inline-block } .s5B081A9D { width:168.28pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s2DC98A4F { margin-left:29.67pt; text-align:center; padding-left:6.33pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s9992913D { margin-left:34.12pt; text-align:center; padding-left:1.88pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 78127/13 Gáspár KORONCZAI against Hungary and 11 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 24   May 2018 as a Committee composed of:   Vincent A. De Gaetano, President,   Georges Ravarani,   Marko Bošnjak, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of criminal proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under Article 13 of the Convention. The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 14 June 2018.   Liv Tigerstedt   Vincent A. De Gaetano Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (excessive length of criminal proceedings)   No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant name Date of birth   Representative name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [i]   78127/13 06/12/2013 Gáspár Koronczai 02/05/1976 Körmendi Csaba Tamás Budapest   01/03/2018 14/03/2018 7,000   63551/14 10/09/2014 Tamás Anka 08/03/1975 Csaba Anka 11/10/1973 Szilvágyi Attila Győr   27/02/2018 12/03/2018 3,500   65688/14 25/09/2014 (4 applicants) László Baráth 03/06/1974 László Bene 07/09/1975 László Gyula Bíró 12/01/1966 Attila Miklovicz 02/04/1968 Koós László Zoltán Debrecen   26/02/2018 14/11/2017 3,500   6905/15 30/01/2015 János Kozák 16/06/1978 Nyári Béla Attila Budapest   22/01/2018 08/03/2018 8,000   14451/15 17/03/2015 Dániel Rézműves 02/02/1979 Kalló Péter Budapest       09/02/2018 08/03/2018 2,000   36100/15 18/07/2015 István Leposa 23/02/1966 Ábrahám Dániel Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings - 14/02/2018 12/03/2018 7,000   36103/15 18/07/2015 Zoltán Gubu 28/01/1972 Ábrahám Dániel Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings - 14/02/2018 12/03/2018 7,000   36105/15 18/07/2015 Ferenc Farkas 10/05/1968 Ábrahám Dániel Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings - 14/02/2018 12/03/2018 7,000   41408/15 14/08/2015 András Péter Kucsera 19/02/1968 Pelle Andrea Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings - 08/03/2018 09/01/2018 6,000   59862/15 25/11/2015 János Balogh 29/10/1955 Sándor Bernadette Dorog   13/03/2018 04/12/2017 4,000   60643/15 02/12/2015 György Imre Szondy 31/12/1960 Gál Zoltán Székesfehérvár   13/03/2018 12/03/2018 3,000   6100/16 23/12/2015 László Vaktor 09/10/1957 Tóth T Balázs Budapest   04/04/2018 26/03/2018 12,000   [i] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.