CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 15 février 2018

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .sE2BDF40E { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:28.35pt; text-align:left } .s835FEB60 { width:150.1pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .sE666739A { width:159.78pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 56836/14 Virginijus GIBRONAS against Lithuania and 14 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 15   February 2018 as a Committee composed of:   Vincent A. De Gaetano, President,   Georges Ravarani,   Marko Bošnjak, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Lithuanian Government (“the Government”). The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Lithuania in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention.   Done in English and notified in writing on 8 March 2018. Liv Tigerstedt   Vincent A. De Gaetano Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant name Date of birth Representative name and location Date of receipt of Government declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [i]     56836/14 06/08/2014 Virginijus Gibronas 14/05/1963     15/01/2018 28/09/2017 4,600     29072/15 05/06/2015 Arūnas Paliušis 24/01/1975     15/01/2018 14/11/2017 2,600     31394/15 20/06/2015 Renaldas Taločka 20/03/1972     15/01/2018 24/10/2017 5,700     58765/15 12/11/2015 Vadim Kriukov 03/12/1985     15/01/2018 17/10/2017 8,800     61704/15 10/12/2015 Viačeslav Michno 19/02/1962     15/01/2018 02/11/2017 12,000     423/16 16/12/2015 Šarūnas Šuminas 01/08/1985     15/01/2018 05/10/2017 5,900     4624/16 15/01/2016 Viktor Dadelo 08/02/1987     15/01/2018 07/11/2017 2,200     5921/16 20/01/2016 Haroldas Radzevičius 27/06/1977 Bartaševičiūtė Marija, Vilnius 15/01/2018 02/01/2018 15,700     6833/16 27/01/2016 Vaclovas Verseckas 26/06/1963     15/01/2018 28/09/2017 4,800   14938/16 02/03/2016 Dainius Stasionis 23/11/1974     15/01/2018 05/10/2017 4,000   18362/16 18/03/2016 Petras Dapkus 12/07/1961     15/01/2018 26/09/2017 8,800   20917/16 11/04/2016 Darius Mickevičius 07/02/1973     15/01/2018 25/09/2017 4,500   21615/16 14/04/2016 Vladislav Janovič 03/07/1968     15/01/2018 23/10/2017 14,300   21620/16 13/04/2016 Tomas Merkelis 12/10/1969     15/01/2018 22/09/2017 3,600   49439/16 17/08/2016 Albert Glinski 01/03/1987     15/01/2018 27/11/2017 6,300   [i] .     Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.