CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG29
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 7 novembre 2017
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1107DEC005743712
- Date
- 7 novembre 2017
- Publication
- 7 novembre 2017
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s943A0290 { width:5.01pt; display:inline-block } .s37F28E47 { width:173.27pt; display:inline-block } .s5B081A9D { width:168.28pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sD35D798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }     FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 57437/12 Rusudan JAVAKHISHVILI and others against Georgia The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 7   November 2017 as a Committee composed of:   Síofra O’Leary, President,   Nona Tsotsoria,   Lәtif Hüseynov, judges, and Anne-Marie Dougin, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 27 August 2012, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE 1.     A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. 2.     The applicants’ complaints under Article 1 of Protocol no. 1 were communicated to the Georgian Government (“the Government”), who were represented by their Agent, Mr B. Dzamashvili, of the Ministry of Justice. 3.     The applicants failed to respond to the last Registry’s letter of 25   August 2017 with its enclosure (sent by registered mail and received by the first applicant (see the appendix) on 5 September 2017), reminding them that the period allowed for submission of their observations in reply had expired on 8 June 2017 and that no extension of time had been requested. Their attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. THE LAW 4.     The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue their application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.   Done in English and notified in writing on 30 November 2017.   Anne-Marie Dougin   Síofra O’Leary Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX   N o . First name Last name Birth date Nationality Place of residence 1. Rusudan JAVAKHISHVILI 13/12/1956 Georgian Batumi 2. Eter KAKABADZE 09/09/1960 Georgian Batumi 3. Zaza KARTSIVADZE 20/01/1975 Georgian Batumi 4. Gulpinaz KIDZINIDZE 10/08/1935 Georgian Batumi 5. Lado MZHAVANADZE 15/06/1942 Georgian Batumi    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 29
- Date
- 7 novembre 2017
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1107DEC005743712
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral