CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 1 juin 2017

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sB8987CE9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s5A29A8C7 { width:12.53pt; display:inline-block } .sFD5071EE { width:207.1pt; display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s30486575 { height:39.15pt } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s5A0A351B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s38135D7A { height:29.25pt } .s29A8756B { height:57.75pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 28542/10 Vladislav Georgiev YANCHEV against Bulgaria and six other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 1   June   2017 as a Committee composed of:   Nona Tsotsoria, President,   Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer,   Latif Huseynov, judges, and Karen Reid, Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates set out in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE 1.     The list of the applicants and the relevant details of their applications are set out in the appended table. 2.     The Bulgarian Government were given notice of the complaints under Articles   3 and 13 of the Convention concerning the allegedly inadequate conditions of the applicants’ detention and the lack of an effective domestic remedy in that respect. They submitted observations on their admissibility and merits. 3.     These observations were then forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit observations in reply. They did not do so. 4.     By letters dated as indicated in the appended table, sent by registered post, the applicants were advised that they had failed to reply to the Registry’s letters. Their attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The applicants received the letters on the dates specified in the appended table or, having been informed by the postal services of the letters’ arrival, left them unclaimed at the post. None of them replied to those letters. THE LAW 5.     In these circumstances, the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue their applications within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. 6.     Accordingly, the cases are to be struck out of the Court’s list of cases. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 22 June 2017.   Karen Reid   Nona Tsotsoria   Registrar   President APPENDIX   No. Application no. Date of introduction Name and date of birth of applicant Time-limit for submitting observations Letter sent to the applicant pursuant to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention Letter received by the applicant (no answer provided)     28542/10 04/05/2010 Vladislav Georgiev Yanchev 01/01/1986 16/06/2016 19/08/2016 (sent to the applicant’s legal representative) Unclaimed: the letter came back unopened to the Court on 26/09/2016.     19493/11 17/02/2011 Plamen Todorov Radkov 03/05/1972 21/06/2016 30/08/2016 Unclaimed the letter came back unopened to the Court on 14/10/2016.     41130/11 10/06/2011 Emil Ivanov Valchev 29/03/1976 31/06/2016 30/08/2016 That letter was received on 08/09/2016.     53131/13 15/08/2013 Biser Emilov Marinov 28/05/1987 13/06/2016 08/08/2016 (sent to the applicant’s designated correspondence address in Ruse and to Lovech Prison, where he had last served his prison sentence) The receipt from Lovech Prison came back to the Court on 24/08/2016 with a note that the applicant was not known at that address. The receipt from Ruse came back to the Court on 28/09/2016 with a signature by the applicant’s grandmother dated 26/08/2016.     17633/14 22/04/2014 Borislav Romeov Boyanov 23/02/1991 13/06/2016 08/08/2016 That letter was received on 19/08/2016.     30500/14 29/05/2014 Dimitar Nikolov Lazarov 02/03/1950 13/06/2016 08/08/2016 Unclaimed: the letter came back unopened to the Court on 15/09/2016.     57504/14 08/10/2014 Kolyu Atanasov Shaykov 12/02/1961 16/06/2016 19/08/2016 (sent to the applicant’s legal representative) The letter was received on 30/08/2016.