CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 23 février 2016

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sF3B96856 { width:11.87pt; display:inline-block } .s65D33CE4 { width:185.75pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 29642/09 Gheorghe NECULA against Romania The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 23   February   2016 as a Committee composed of:   Vincent A. De Gaetano, President,   Krzysztof Wojtyczek,   Iulia Antoanella Motoc, judges, and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 3 August 2006, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Gheorghe Necula, is a Romanian national, who was born in 1955 and lives in Galați. The Romanian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their   Agent, Mrs C. Brumar, from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the unfairness of the civil proceedings instituted by him for the recalculation of his pension rights. The applicant’s complaint was communicated to the Government, who submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were not forwarded to the applicant on account that he had not appointed a lawyer to represent him in the proceedings before the Court. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter of 3   June   2014. By two letters dated 16 October and 3 December 2014, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for appointing a lawyer had expired. The applicant’s attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The applicant did not receive any of these letters as both were returned with the mention that the applicant had not been found at his address. THE LAW The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue his application, within the meaning of Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37   §   1 in   fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.   Done in English and notified in writing on 17 March 2016.   Fatoş Aracı   Vincent A. De Gaetano Deputy Registrar   President