CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 26 août 2014

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sA8776625 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.6pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s44FEBCB5 { width:174.27pt; display:inline-block } .s5B081A9D { width:168.28pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s8F670191 { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; list-style-position:inside }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 10926/06 Aleksandr Vasilyevich KORCHAGIN against Russia and 3 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 26   August 2014 as a Committee composed of:   Khanlar Hajiyev, President,   Julia Laffranque,   Erik Møse, judges, and Søren Prebensen, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on 26 January 2006, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE A.     Application no.   10926/06, lodged on 26   January 2006 The applicant, Mr Aleksandr Vasilyevich Korchagin, is a Russian national, who was born in 1974 and is serving a prison sentence in the Vladimir Region. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr   G.   Matyushkin, Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights. The applicant’s complaint under Article   6 of the Convention about the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings against him was communicated to the Government, who submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicant, who was invited to submit his own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter. By letter dated 17   December 2013, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 12   August 2013 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicant’s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The letter was delivered on 4   January 2014. However, no response has been received. B.     Application no.   17657/06, lodged on 22   March 2006 The applicant, Ms Zinaida Sergeyevna Khrustaleva, is a Russian national, who was born in 1952 and lives in Moscow. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr   G.   Matyushkin, Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights. The applicant’s complaint under Article   8 of the Convention about her family’s eviction was communicated to the Government, who submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicant, who was invited to submit her own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter. By letter dated 17   December 2013, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of her observations had expired on 28   March 2013 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicant’s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The letter was delivered on 6   January 2014 but never claimed by the applicant. C.     Application no.   45125/06, lodged on 9   October 2006 The applicant, Mr Yevgeniy Ivanovich Rozhkov, is a Russian national, who was born in 1975 and is serving a prison sentence in Abakan, Khakassiya Republic. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr   G.   Matyushkin, Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights. The applicant’s complaint under Article   5 of the Convention about the length of his pre-trial detention was communicated to the Government, who submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicant, who was invited to submit his own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter. By letter dated 17   December 2013, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 27   March 2013 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicant’s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The letter was delivered on 10   January 2014. However, no response has been received. D.     Application no.   54081/08, lodged on 4   August 2008 The applicant, Mr Konstantin Yuryevich Smetanin, is a Russian national, who was born in 1976 and is serving a prison sentence in the Vladimir Region. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr   G.   Matyushkin, Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights. The applicant’s complaint under Article   3 of the Convention about the conditions of his detention in a correctional colony was communicated to the Government, who submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicant, who was invited to submit his own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter. By letter dated 17   December 2013, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 6   June 2013 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicant’s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The letter was delivered on 8   January 2014. However, no response has been received. THE LAW In accordance with Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the Court decides to join the applications. The Court considers that, in the circumstances of the case, the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue their applications, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the cases. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases.    Søren Prebensen   Khanlar Hajiyev Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX   No Application No Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence   10926/06 26/01/2006 Aleksandr Vasilyevich KORCHAGIN 01/01/1974 Vyazniki, Vladimir Region     17657/06 22/03/2006 Zinaida Sergeyevna KHRUSTALEVA 01/10/1952 Moscow     45125/06 09/10/2006 Yevgeniy Ivanovich ROZHKOV 22/05/1975 Abakan, Khakassiya Republic     54081/08 04/08/2008 Konstantin Yuryevich SMETANIN 14/12/1976 Melekhovo, Vladimir Region