CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG28
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 7 septembre 2010
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0907DEC003252307
- Date
- 7 septembre 2010
- Publication
- 7 septembre 2010
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s967D43C6 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s88A92475 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sDD165512 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF3B96856 { width:11.87pt; display:inline-block } .s82B56815 { width:201.76pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 32523/07 by Juraj BANYKÓ against Slovakia The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 7   September 2010 as a Committee composed of:   Giovanni Bonello, President,   Lech Garlicki,   Ján Šikuta, judges, and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 20 July 2007, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: PROCEDURE The application was lodged by Mr Juraj Banykó, a Slovak national who was born in 1954 and lives in Rapotín. The Slovak Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs M. Pirošíková. The present case concerned the applicant's civil claim introduced on 18   October 1990. The proceedings were stayed ex lege due to the insolvency proceedings brought against the applicant's debtor. Several courts at various levels of jurisdiction dealt with the applicant's claim and related issues in several sets of proceedings. On 26 April 2007 the Constitutional Court found a violation of the constitutional equivalent of the applicant's right to a hearing within a reasonable time and ordered the responsible court to proceed with the case. It awarded the applicant the equivalent of 2,080   euros (EUR) at that time as just satisfaction for non ‑ pecuniary damage suffered. On 27   January 2009 it rejected the applicant's fresh constitutional complaint. The applicant's civil claim has not yet been decided upon by a final decision. On 7 and 15 July 2010 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicant agreed to waive any further claims against Slovakia in respect of the facts giving rise to this application against an undertaking by the Government to pay him EUR   9,000 to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses. This sum would be free of any taxes that might be applicable. It will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article   37 §   1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case. THE LAW The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention). In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.   Fatoş Aracı   Giovanni Bonello Deputy Registrar   President  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 28
- Date
- 7 septembre 2010
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0907DEC003252307
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral