CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG1
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG — 17 janvier 1996
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0117DEC002121393
- Date
- 17 janvier 1996
- Publication
- 17 janvier 1996
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleAdmissible
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }                         AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF                         Application No. 21213/93                       by T. H.                       against Austria        The European Commission of Human Rights (First Chamber) sitting in private on 17 January 1996, the following members being present:              Mr.    C.L. ROZAKIS, President            Mrs.   J. LIDDY            MM.    E. BUSUTTIL                  A.S. GÖZÜBÜYÜK                  A. WEITZEL                  M.P. PELLONPÄÄ                  B. MARXER                  B. CONFORTI                  N. BRATZA                  I. BÉKÉS                  E. KONSTANTINOV                  G. RESS                  A. PERENIC                  C. BÎRSAN                  K. HERNDL              Mrs.   M.F. BUQUICCHIO, Secretary to the Chamber        Having regard to Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;        Having regard to the application introduced on 27 August 1992 by T. H. against Austria and registered under file No. 21213/93;        Having regard to:   -     the reports provided for in Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure of      the Commission; -     the Commissions's partial decision of 18 October 1994;   -     the observations submitted by the respondent Government on      1 February 1995, and the observations in reply submitted by the      applicant on 2 May 1995;        Having deliberated;        Decides as follows:   THE FACTS        The applicant is an Austrian citizen.   She is represented before the Commission by Mr. Erich Proksch, a lawyer practising in Vienna.        The applicant was convicted in administrative criminal proceedings of contraventions of the legislation on rest times for drivers.   Penal orders were issued on 4 January 1991, 7 January 1991 and 8 January 1991 by the Baden District Authority by which the applicant was fined totals of AS 38,500.00 (penal orders of 4 January), AS 15,500.00 (7 January) and AS 2,500 (8 January).   Periods of detention in default of 42 days (4 January), 16 days (7 January) and 72 hours (8 January) were ordered.        The applicant's appeal to the Lower Austrian Regional Government was rejected on 18 March 1991, although one of the fines was reduced.        On 11 June 1991 the Constitutional Court rejected the applicant's constitutional complaint, and on 20 July 1992 the Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's administrative complaint.   COMPLAINTS        The applicant alleges a violation of Article 6 of the Convention in that her conviction in administrative criminal proceedings was not accompanied by the requisite procedural guarantees, in particular that the Administrative Court was not a "tribunal" within the meaning of Article 6 para. 1 of the Convention.   PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COMMISSION        The Commission took a partial decision in the case on 18 October 1994.        The Government's observations were submitted on 1 February 1995 and the applicant's observations in reply on 2 May 1995.   THE LAW        The applicant alleges a violation of Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention.   The Government consider that the case does not disclose a violation of Article 6 (Art. 6).        The Commission has had regard to the facts of the present case, to the parties' observations, and to the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights.   It finds that the case raises questions under the Convention which cannot at this stage be rejected as being manifestly ill-founded, and which require to be determined on the merits.   No other ground of inadmissibility has been established.        For these reasons, the Commission, unanimously,        DECLARES THE REMAINDER OF THE APPLICATION ADMISSIBLE, without      prejudging the merits of the case.   Secretary to the First Chamber       President of the First Chamber          (M.F. BUQUICCHIO)                     (C.L. ROZAKIS)  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
- Formation
- 1
- Date
- 17 janvier 1996
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0117DEC002121393
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral