CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG — 7 mai 1990

.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }                        AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF                         Application No. 15938/89                       by Guisto DEBONO                       against Malta             The European Commission of Human Rights sitting in private on 7 May 1990, the following members being present:                 MM. C.A. NØRGAARD, President                   S. TRECHSEL                   F. ERMACORA                   E. BUSUTTIL                   G. JÖRUNDSSON                   A.S. GÖZÜBÜYÜK                   A. WEITZEL                   J.-C. SOYER                   H. DANELIUS                   G. BATLINER                   H. VANDENBERGHE              Sir   Basil HALL              MM.   F. MARTINEZ                   C.L. ROZAKIS              Mrs.   J. LIDDY              Mr.   L. LOUCAIDES                Mr.   H.C. KRÜGER, Secretary to the Commission           Having regard to Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;           Having regard to the application introduced on 17 October 1989 by Guisto DEBONO against Malta and registered on 22 December 1989 under file No. 15938/89;           Having regard to the report provided for in Rule 40 of the Rules of Procedure of the Commission;           Having deliberated;           Decides as follows:           The applicant is a Maltese citizen born in 1954 and resident in Qormi.   He is represented by Francis Debono, his father.           The applicant complains of criminal proceedings which appear to have taken place in 1983-1985 and civil proceedings which are still pending concerning the demolition of certain buildings.   He complains inter alia that he did not receive a fair hearing, that incorrect evidence was submitted by witnesses and that there were unnecessary delays in the proceedings.   He also complains of discrimination.   He invokes Article 6 and Article 14 of the Convention.           The Commission has examined the applicant's separate complaints as they have been submitted by him.   The Commission notes however that the applicant has failed to substantiate his claims or to provide the relevant supporting documents.   In these circumstances the Commission finds that the application as submitted fails to disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention.           It follows that the application is as a whole manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 27 para. 2 of the Convention.           For these reasons, the Commission           DECLARES THE APPLICATION INADMISSIBLE.          Secretary to the Commission         President of the Commission                 (H.C. KRÜGER)                      (C.A. NØRGAARD)