CEDH · CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG — 7 avril 1961

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5C5E66B9 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .sC202EACC { clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sB8987CE9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sED22C8DF { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; vertical-align:sub; color:#0069d6 } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sED24426B { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:sub; color:#0069d6 }       COURT (CHAMBER)             CASE OF LAWLESS v. IRELAND (No. 2)   (Application n o 332/57)                     JUDGMENT       STRASBOURG   7 April 1961 THE COURT, Having regard to the conclusion [1] presented by the Delegates of the European Commission of Human Rights at the hearing on 7th April 1961; Taking note of the fact that the Agent of the Irish Government does not intend to submit conclusions on the matter in question; Whereas in its judgment of 14th November 1960 the Court declared that there was no reason at this stage to authorise the Commission to transmit to it the written observations of the Applicant on the Commission's Report; Whereas in the said judgment, of which the French text only is authentic the Court has recognised the Commission's right to take into account ("de faire état") the Applicant's views on its own authority, as a proper way of enlightening the Court; Whereas this latitude enjoyed by the Commission extends to any other views the Commission may have obtained from the Applicant in the course of the proceedings before the Court; Whereas, on the other hand, the Commission is entirely free to decide by what means it wishes to establish contact with the Applicant and give him an opportunity to make known his views to the Commission; whereas in particular it is free to ask the Applicant to nominate a person to be available to the Commission's delegates; whereas it does not follow that the person in question has any locus standi in judicio; For these reasons, Decides unanimously: With regard to the conclusions under (a), that at the present stage the written observations of the Applicant, as reproduced in paragraphs 31 to 49 of the Commission's statement of 16th December 1960, are not to be considered as part of the proceedings in the case; With regard to (b) that the Commission has all latitude, in the course of debates and insofar as it believes they may be useful to enlighten the Court, to take in account the views of the Applicant concerning either the Report or any other specific point which may have arisen since the lodging of the Report; With regard to (c), that it was for the Commission, when it considered it desirable to do so, to invite the Applicant to place some person at its disposal, subject to the reservations indicated above.   [1] Sir Humphrey Waldock, Principal Delegate of the European Commission of Human Rights, made at the public hearing of 7th April 1961, the following submission: "May it please the Court to rule that the Delegates of the Commission are entitled: (a) to consider as part of the proceedings in the case those written observations of the Applicant on the Commission's Report contained in paragraphs 31 to 49 of the Commission's statement of 16th December 1960, as indicated on page 15 of the Court's judgment of 14th November 1960; (b) to make known to the Court the Applicant's point of view on any specific points arising in the course of the debates, as indicated on page 15 of the Court's judgment of 14th November 1960; (c) to consider the person nominated by the Applicant to be a person available to give such assistance to the delegates as they may think fit to request in order to make known to the Court the Applicant's point of view on any specific points arising in the course of the debates." Mr. A. O'Keeffe, acting as Agent of the Irish Government, said he would leave the matter to the discretion of the Court.