CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

45 831 résultats pour « Stuck »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1121DEC002846302

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2006

21 novembre 2006

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1121DEC002779402

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2006

21 novembre 2006

The police officers then used truncheons, sticks and tear gas bombs to disperse the crowd. Several participants were wounded during the incident.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1121DEC002779002

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2006

21 novembre 2006

The police officers then used truncheons, sticks and gas bombs to disperse the crowd. The applicant was injured during the incidents and obtained a medical report to that effect.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1121DEC002088102

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2006

21 novembre 2006

The police officers then used truncheons, sticks and gas bombs to disperse the crowd. The applicant was injured during the incidents and obtained a medical report to that effect.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1123DEC003048502

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2006

23 novembre 2006

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1123DEC002062802

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2006

23 novembre 2006

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1127DEC003403703

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2006

27 novembre 2006

Moreover, he has failed to respond to registered letters dated 17   November 2005 and 19 January 2006, warning him of the possibility that his case might be struck out of the Court’s list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1130DEC003880302

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2006

30 novembre 2006

Moreover, he has failed to respond to a registered letter dated 6 September 2006, warning him of the possibility that his case might be struck out of the Court’s list if he did not reply.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1130DEC003737002

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2006

30 novembre 2006

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1130DEC001980402

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2006

30 novembre 2006

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1207DEC002893302

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 2006

7 décembre 2006

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1212DEC002275203

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2006

12 décembre 2006

In these circumstances, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1212DEC000438402

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2006

12 décembre 2006

With reference to Article 37 §§   1(a) of the Convention, the Court considers that the case should be struck out of its list of cases.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1212DEC007635701

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2006

12 décembre 2006

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0321DEC005426000

Admin. suprême

21 mars 2002

21 mars 2002

Struck out of the list

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0321DEC005519800

Admin. suprême

21 mars 2002

21 mars 2002

Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the Court’s list of cases. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0321DEC006385100

Admin. suprême

21 mars 2002

21 mars 2002

December 2001 the applicant stated that he did not wish to proceed with his application and by its letter of 5 February 2002 the Court requested the applicant to confirm his agreement that his case be struck

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0321DEC003918998

Admin. suprême

21 mars 2002

21 mars 2002

Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0409JUD002630795

Admin. suprême

9 avril 2002

9 avril 2002

    Accordingly, the application should be struck out of the list. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT 1 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0409JUD002760195

Admin. suprême

9 avril 2002

9 avril 2002

    Accordingly, the application should be struck out of the list. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT 1 .

Source officielle

Page 99 sur 2292

← PrécédentSuivant →