relates to offences of a similar nature as those having formed the object of the criminal proceedings against the accused, such as for instance drug offences, property offences and offences involving forgery

While serving a prison sentence for theft, robbery and forgery, a civil claim was brought against him.

    On 27   May 2003 La Laguna University lodged a criminal complaint against the applicant, a professor at the university’s Faculty of Pharmacy, accusing him of committing forgery.

It further notes that the Government did not explain why the forgery of documents was not discovered when the relevant authorities dealt with K.’s requests for exchange and subsequent privatisation of

    The Court notes that there is no indication in the materials submitted by the parties that the applicant committed any offence of forgery or bribery in connection with the performance of

The applicant was charged with altogether 17 counts of car theft or attempted car theft and one count of forgery of documents.

In 2000 he was convicted of forgery and fraud and sentenced to two weeks’ arrest as a juvenile offender.

He was charged with bribery, abuse of power and forgery, on the basis of criminal complaints lodged by M.M. and G.A (hereinafter “the complainants”), two individuals he had assisted as a bailiff in enforcement

supérieur à trois fois le minimum INPS pour les années 2012 et 2013, après l’arrêt de la Cour constitutionnelle n o   70/2015 qui a déclaré inconstitutionnelle la norme prévue dans la loi dite “Fornero

Thus, while doubts as to the outcome of the applicants’ compensation claim were justified, the outcome itself was not, at that time, a foregone conclusion.

Criminal proceedings for forgery were opened against one of the owners of the neighbouring plot, but the investigation was subsequently directed against the applicant.

He was convicted of forgery and suppressing documents on 10 September 1998 and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. He appealed.

    On 17 March 2010 the applicant was arrested by police office and charged with fraud and forgery of official documents.

The charges under that Article were divided into three different counts: one relating to five instances in 1993 and 1994 of the forgery and fabrication of documents intended to show commercial dealings

Afghanistan (under Taliban rule until January 2002) and/or the Taliban and their allies (Al-Qaeda and/or other pro-Taliban combatants) and which organisation was further involved in drug-trafficking, forgery

The applicant’s representative in the proceedings before the Court admits that the letter allegedly received by him from the Commission, dated 25 September 1995, is an obvious forgery.

around early 1996, the applicant was charged, pursuant to section 42 of the Naval Discipline Act 1957 (“the 1957 Act”), with three civilian offences (one under the Theft Act 1968 and two under the Forgery

investigator of the Malinovsky District Police Station of Odessa ( Малинівський районний відділ внутрішніх справ , hereafter “the Police Station”) instituted criminal proceedings against Mr O. for forgery

    At the material time, the sixth applicant, Mr Barış İnan, was detained in Kocaeli F-Type Prison no. 2 for attempting to overthrow the constitutional order, forgery of an official document