CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

45 831 résultats pour « Stuck »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1019DEC003827097

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 1998

19 octobre 1998

Struck out of the list

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1020DEC004236898

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 1998

20 octobre 1998

The Commission is therefore satisfied that the application can be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 30 paras. 1 (a) and (b) of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1027REP002729995

Admin. suprême

27 octobre 1998

27 octobre 1998

He was warned that a failure to respond by 16 October 1998 might lead to the application being struck off on the assumption that he had lost interest in pursuing it.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1027REP002968096

Admin. suprême

27 octobre 1998

27 octobre 1998

  By a letter of 21 September 1998 the Government informed the Secretariat of the Commission that they did not have any objections to   the case being struck off the Commission's list of cases

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1019DEC004068202

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2006

19 octobre 2006

In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1024DEC002421602

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2006

24 octobre 2006

In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1024DEC001401102

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2006

24 octobre 2006

In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1024DEC003449604

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2006

24 octobre 2006

By letter of 22 September 2006 the Swedish Government stated that they had no objection to the application being struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1106JUD004457498

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2006

6 novembre 2006

    On 19 December 1989 the Ljubljana Bank Head Office was reregistered as a joint stock company with effect from 1 January 1990. 24.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3073

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2006

6 novembre 2006

-c Continued examination not justified Some applicants had received payment in full of “frozen” foreign currency deposits, and domestic proceedings in Croatia are still open to a further applicant: struck

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1107DEC006875501

Admin. suprême

7 novembre 2006

7 novembre 2006

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1109DEC002819003

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2006

9 novembre 2006

the Court concludes that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application, that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and that the case should be struck

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1109DEC001171404

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2006

9 novembre 2006

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1109DEC003215003

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2006

9 novembre 2006

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply and the case should be struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1109DEC002843804

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2006

9 novembre 2006

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1109DEC001477902

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2006

9 novembre 2006

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1113DEC000718502

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2006

13 novembre 2006

to respond to the communications from the Registry of the Court, the last of which was a registered letter dated 3   July 2006 warning the applicants of the possibility that their case might be struck

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1113DEC000921502

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2006

13 novembre 2006

has failed to respond to the communications from the Registry of the Court, the last of which was a registered letter dated 3 July 2006 warning the applicant of the possibility that its case might be struck

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1121DEC000385805

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2006

21 novembre 2006

                        Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1121DEC002088502

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2006

21 novembre 2006

The police officers then used truncheons, sticks and gas bombs to disperse the crowd. The applicants were wounded during the incident.

Source officielle

Page 98 sur 2292

← PrécédentSuivant →

Annonces BODACC205 résultats

Journal officiel
Radiations

Stucker, Benjamin Philippe

SIREN 990297012Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de Libourne

16/07/2026

Voir →

Modifications diverses

Gruner Stucky SA

SIREN 925001737Greffe du Tribunal des Activités Economiques de Paris

17/06/2026

Voir →

Modifications diverses

SCP BENICHOU & STUCKER

SIREN 414515296Greffe du Tribunal des Activités Economiques de Paris

14/06/2026

Voir →

Créations

STUCKLE

SIREN 105820013Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de Tours

12/06/2026

Voir →

Modifications diverses

CENTRE DE SOINS INFIRMIERS DE STUCKANGE LES ABEILLES

SIREN 813123494Greffe du Tribunal Judiciaire de Thionville

17/05/2026

Voir →