CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

13 660 résultats pour « Cointe »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0903DEC003017809

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 2013

3 septembre 2013

He was acquitted of count six. He was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment. His daughter’s evidence of indecent assault was supported by evidence from her grandmother, her mother and two doctors.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1130DEC002484194

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 1994

30 novembre 1994

  In January 1986, Guinness announced a counter-bid.   There was a series of further increased offers from Argyll and Guinness.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0530DEC005316199

Admin. suprême

30 mai 2002

30 mai 2002

On 14 August 1996 the applicant was charged on five counts, including cheating and embezzlement. On 22 August 1996 he was remanded on bail. There were four other co-accused persons in the case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0905DEC003936098

Admin. suprême

5 septembre 2000

5 septembre 2000

Ultimately, the indictment preferred against him contained three counts of rape, three counts of indecent assault and one count of indecency with a child.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-997969-1035067

Admin. suprême

19 mai 2004

19 mai 2004

The police officers then had to use force to bring the first applicant under control and spread-eagled him against the counter before handcuffing him.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0427DEC003879897

Admin. suprême

27 avril 2000

27 avril 2000

The defendant lodged a counter-action and claimed the opposite.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-883968-908286

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2003

4 décembre 2003

However, it appeared that this was no longer required in European countries.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0503JUD006688209

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2012

3 mai 2012

On 27   May 2008 it appointed an institution in the Czech Republic with a view to obtaining a counter-opinion.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0830DEC001657215

Admin. suprême

30 août 2016

30 août 2016

    On 6 April 2014 the applicant party filed a complaint about the election results with the YSK and requested a re-count of the votes because of electoral discrepancies and fraud.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0830DEC001657615

Admin. suprême

30 août 2016

30 août 2016

    On 6 April 2014 the CHP filed a complaint about the election results with the YSK and asked for a re-count because of electoral discrepancies and fraud.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1972:0323DEC000507671

Admin. suprême

23 mars 1972

23 mars 1972

  At his trial the applicant initially pleaded not guilty to all the counts against him.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0619DEC001408103

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2007

19 juin 2007

On 3 February 1994 one of the defendants counter-claimed that the applicant should pay a sum for the repair of the car.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC007088301

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2003

16 décembre 2003

On 26 November 1992 the Supreme Court quashed the Linz Regional Court’s decision regarding the conviction of the applicant’s husband relating to the counts on aggravated fraud and fraudulent bankruptcy

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0831DEC002000192

Admin. suprême

31 août 1994

31 août 1994

        On 10 October 1985 the Feldkirch Regional Court (Landesgericht) convicted the applicant of aggravated theft (schwerer Diebstahl) involving eighteen separate counts

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2396288-2593870

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2008

24 juin 2008

Tensions arose when the authorities of the “Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus” (“TRNC”) announced that they would organise “counter-rallies” with the participation of the Turkish extremist “Grey Wolves

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0529DEC004318004

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2007

29 mai 2007

On 25 January 1996 the applicant was questioned by the police as a suspect and he was subsequently charged with four counts of economic crime allegedly committed in 1991.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0407DEC002052392

Admin. suprême

7 avril 1994

7 avril 1994

He was charged with having committed fraud on several counts to the detriment of the above-mentioned insurance company.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-159283

Admin. suprême

18 novembre 2015

18 novembre 2015

On an unknown date A.I. was charged with murdering P.A., and the applicant and a certain T.K. were only charged with theft and several counts of robbery.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0312DEC004364998

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2002

12 mars 2002

At the same time, the District Court dismissed the defendant’s counter-action brought with a view to establishing rights of servitude. The District Court essentially relied on the expert opinions.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1912635-2016692

Admin. suprême

6 février 2007

6 février 2007

He was sentenced to nine years’ imprisonment by Katowice Regional Court following his conviction on two counts of robbery and 14 counts of burglary.

Source officielle

Page 98 sur 683

← PrécédentSuivant →