CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

11 119 résultats pour « Behague »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0428JUD004586422

Admin. suprême

28 avril 2026

28 avril 2026

    Mr Kanev, acting both in his personal capacity and on behalf of the Committee, sought judicial review under section 36(9) of the 2007 Act (see paragraph 72 below) of the Agency’s decision

Page 98 sur 556

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0414DEC001606490

Admin. suprême

14 avril 1998

14 avril 1998

Achilleas Demetriades, a lawyer practising in Nicosia, under an authority signed by the second applicant in her own name and on behalf of the first applicant.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2655313-2903046

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2009

6 mars 2009

Ukraine (no. 2929/05) The applicant, Grigoriy Svetlorusov, is a Belarus national who was born in 1966 and lives in Kyiv (Ukraine).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0612JUD002033003

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2008

12 juin 2008

  Одеса ) [1] on the applicant’s behalf, seeking annulment of the sales contracts in respect of the apartment formerly co-owned by her.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0106DEC003338296

Admin. suprême

6 janvier 2000

6 janvier 2000

  (d)     to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him; ..

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920DEC000733210

Admin. suprême

20 septembre 2011

20 septembre 2011

At the same time he applied for a lawyer to be appointed to act on his behalf and for a waiver of the court fees.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0618DEC004233406

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2019

18 juin 2019

They further argued that the shareholders only authorised the applicants to represent them before the Court, but the applicants submitted the application forms on their own behalf, not on behalf of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1002DEC003809213

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2018

2 octobre 2018

they submitted that it was unclear on what basis it had been made by the clerk who had made it since the court file contained no submission to the effect that the power of attorney of A. to act on behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0609JUD001749216

Admin. suprême

9 juin 2022

9 juin 2022

Mr   Lyapin under Articles   3 and   13 of the Convention belonged to the category of non-transferrable rights and that his mother could not claim to be the victim of a violation on behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0330DEC004562999

Admin. suprême

30 mars 1999

30 mars 1999

He maintained that although he had invited the Appeal Court to hear ten witnesses on his behalf, the president of the Court refused to hear two of them and that this refusal had not been included in the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1020JUD002203903

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2020

20 octobre 2020

Ms Maria Nistor died in 2010 and Mr Mircea Nestor (the third applicant, her sole heir), expressed his intention to pursue the application on her behalf. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0904DEC004144498

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 2001

4 septembre 2001

(d)     to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him; ...”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0520DEC001364806

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2010

20 mai 2010

    Relying on Article 6 § 3 (d) of the Convention, the applicant complained that the domestic courts had not examined witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0209DEC004853107

Admin. suprême

9 février 2010

9 février 2010

Likewise, they failed to submit an original of the authorisation to act on their behalf which they had given to Ms J.W.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-142596

Admin. suprême

25 mars 2014

25 mars 2014

C.I. did not request damages on behalf of the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1213DEC004234104

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2005

13 décembre 2005

Mr Carter advised that there was merit in an appeal, and applied for legal aid on his client's behalf in April 1993; this application was rejected on 25   May 1993.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-112182

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2012

27 juin 2012

there was no concrete ground to give rise to any justified suspicion that he would continue engaging in the activities under investigation because he had either never had any authorisation to act on behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0131JUD001061602

Admin. suprême

31 janvier 2008

31 janvier 2008

It has not been disputed that his son is entitled to pursue the application on his behalf and the Court sees no reason to hold otherwise (see, mutatis mutandis , Kalló v. Hungary , no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0103DEC002275904

Admin. suprême

3 janvier 2008

3 janvier 2008

The Court observes that the applicant was the chairman of the Cooperative, competent to act on its behalf in the domestic proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-223413

Admin. suprême

6 février 2023

6 février 2023

. – the second applicant) on their own behalf and in the name of their minor child (V.O. - the third applicant, born on 8   November 2009). All the applicants are Ukrainian nationals.

Source officielle