CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0428JUD004586422
28 avril 2026
Mr Kanev, acting both in his personal capacity and on behalf of the Committee, sought judicial review under section 36(9) of the 2007 Act (see paragraph 72 below) of the Agency’s decision
Page 98 sur 556
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0414DEC001606490
14 avril 1998
Achilleas Demetriades, a lawyer practising in Nicosia, under an authority signed by the second applicant in her own name and on behalf of the first applicant.
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2655313-2903046
6 mars 2009
Ukraine (no. 2929/05) The applicant, Grigoriy Svetlorusov, is a Belarus national who was born in 1966 and lives in Kyiv (Ukraine).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0612JUD002033003
12 juin 2008
Одеса ) [1] on the applicant’s behalf, seeking annulment of the sales contracts in respect of the apartment formerly co-owned by her.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0106DEC003338296
6 janvier 2000
(d) to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him; ..
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920DEC000733210
20 septembre 2011
At the same time he applied for a lawyer to be appointed to act on his behalf and for a waiver of the court fees.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0618DEC004233406
18 juin 2019
They further argued that the shareholders only authorised the applicants to represent them before the Court, but the applicants submitted the application forms on their own behalf, not on behalf of the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1002DEC003809213
2 octobre 2018
they submitted that it was unclear on what basis it had been made by the clerk who had made it since the court file contained no submission to the effect that the power of attorney of A. to act on behalf
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0609JUD001749216
9 juin 2022
Mr Lyapin under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention belonged to the category of non-transferrable rights and that his mother could not claim to be the victim of a violation on behalf
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0330DEC004562999
30 mars 1999
He maintained that although he had invited the Appeal Court to hear ten witnesses on his behalf, the president of the Court refused to hear two of them and that this refusal had not been included in the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1020JUD002203903
20 octobre 2020
Ms Maria Nistor died in 2010 and Mr Mircea Nestor (the third applicant, her sole heir), expressed his intention to pursue the application on her behalf. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0904DEC004144498
4 septembre 2001
(d) to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him; ...”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0520DEC001364806
20 mai 2010
Relying on Article 6 § 3 (d) of the Convention, the applicant complained that the domestic courts had not examined witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0209DEC004853107
9 février 2010
Likewise, they failed to submit an original of the authorisation to act on their behalf which they had given to Ms J.W.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-142596
25 mars 2014
C.I. did not request damages on behalf of the applicant.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1213DEC004234104
13 décembre 2005
Mr Carter advised that there was merit in an appeal, and applied for legal aid on his client's behalf in April 1993; this application was rejected on 25 May 1993.
ECLI:CEDH:001-112182
27 juin 2012
there was no concrete ground to give rise to any justified suspicion that he would continue engaging in the activities under investigation because he had either never had any authorisation to act on behalf
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0131JUD001061602
31 janvier 2008
It has not been disputed that his son is entitled to pursue the application on his behalf and the Court sees no reason to hold otherwise (see, mutatis mutandis , Kalló v. Hungary , no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0103DEC002275904
3 janvier 2008
The Court observes that the applicant was the chairman of the Cooperative, competent to act on its behalf in the domestic proceedings.
ECLI:CEDH:001-223413
6 février 2023
. – the second applicant) on their own behalf and in the name of their minor child (V.O. - the third applicant, born on 8 November 2009). All the applicants are Ukrainian nationals.