When separately convicting his alleged co-perpetrators, the court named the applicant and made, as it later said, “very specific references to [his] direct and clear involvement in the crimes committed

Application no. 40633/15 FEDERATION OF TRADE UNIONS OF CHERNIGIV REGION against Ukraine lodged on 11 August 2015 communicated on 29 November 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged

xa0; FOURTH SECTION Application no. 34122/23 Joel LEOCÁDIO DE LEMOS against Portugal lodged on 4 September 2023 communicated on 11 October 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged

barreau d’ORLEANS (postulant), EXPEDITION GROSSE Délivré le La cause appelée, A l’audience de la Chambre de la Famille, du 09 Octobre 2025, en chambre du conseil où siégeait Frédéric ALBAREDE

Alférid Ishak X... Z... ; M.

inhuman and degrading treatment (complaint under Article 3), the alleged violation of the applicants' right to respect for their private and family life (complaint under Article 8), the length of certain

The Government generally denied the applicant’s version of the events and alleged that her husband was a PKK sympathiser who had changed his identity and probably joined that organisation.

Moreover, they alleged that the father, the first applicant, would not be safe if returned to Bosnia and Herzegovina as he had been involved as a member of a police unit in the arrest of a mafia criminal

  The applicants consider that the Moldovan authorities are responsible under the Convention for the alleged violations of their Convention rights since they have not taken adequate measures to stop

In addition, the Court noted that under its case-law on Article   13, the right to an effective remedy in respect of an alleged violation of a Convention right by a last-instance judicial authority

2020   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 73944/14 Yuriy Yakovlevich STESHENKO against Ukraine lodged on 19 November 2014 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application mainly concerns the applicant’s alleged

Lastly, they also concern the complaint under Article 6 §§1 and 3 (b) of the Convention concerning the trial court’s alleged failure to specify the documents on the basis of which it asked the applicants

  Azerbaijan , nos. 67360/11 and 2 others, 11 February 2016) and the authorities’ alleged failure to notify him of the hearing held on 19   September 2006 in which he was convicted.

The articles covered a story regarding an alleged kidnapping in the Chechen Republic of a Mr P., purportedly a friend of Mr K.’s father.

The applicant alleged in the civil proceedings against the publishing company that he had nothing to do with the accusations, that the journalist had mistaken the identity of the alleged fraudster and

His parents, the second and third applicants, were not allowed to take him home. The first applicant alleged that he had been beaten one night by nurses and patients.

The applicants alleged under Article 6 of the Convention that their right to a fair hearing was violated by the national courts.

On 21 September 2012 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against the State before the Zagreb Municipal Civil Court ( Općinski građanski sud u Zagrebu ) claiming damages for his alleged ill-treatment

.) - 18324/04 Decision 29.9.2009 [Section V] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for home Respect for private life Alleged nuisance caused by opening of dental surgery in a residential block of flats: inadmissible