that, although the duration of relevant proceedings is obviously an important element, it is not necessarily in itself decisive for the question of whether a decision has been given with the requisite speed

fish species.

  The time when inmates are to be allowed to spend time together and the duration of such contact shall be determined in advance."

It provides feeding and breeding grounds for a variety of wildlife including a number of species of molluscs and seabirds.

What is said, however is that detention to achieve speedy process ‘for administrative convenience’ is not within para. 1 (f).

He stated that during the incident before his arrest V. had hit him on the left hip with a spade handle, and he had punched him back in the face. 21.

    The speed with which the case had been processed was not open to criticism. The governor had dealt with the case speedily.

    The Road Traffic Safety Act (Official Gazette no. 83/2004) at the relevant time provided that several minor offences, including offences of driving over a speed-limit or driving under the

The gunman got back into the car and the car drove off at speed. The police arrived at the scene within a few minutes, having been called on the emergency number.

Traffic lights, speed ramps, a pedestrian crossing would have helped to alleviate the situation. Moreover, the police did not examine the driver for any traces of drugs or alcohol in his blood.

    Did the length of the proceedings in application no. 66094/12, by which the applicant sought to challenge the lawfulness of his pre-trial detention, comply with the “speed” requirement of

been crossing the pedestrian crossing, had suddenly fallen into the applicant’s traffic lane – a short distance away from the applicant’s car – after an on-coming vehicle had gone past at very high speed

It had also failed to request the administrative inspectorate ( Управен инспекторат ) to intervene in order to speed up the proceedings.

The applicant in the second application was a speed skater on whom sanctions had been imposed for doping.

that the applicant has not made any applications under Section 91 of the Courts Act (Gerichtsorganisationsgesetz), nor has he made an hierarchical appeal (Aufsichtsbeschwerde) with the judiciary to speed

On 20 November 2001 the applicant requested the court to speed up the proceedings.

on the basis of admissions made while detained in the Rīga Regional Police Department (Latgale police station of Rīga) and that his complaints in that regard had not been examined with the requisite speed

Did the length of the proceedings in the present case, by which the applicant sought to challenge the lawfulness of detention orders of 31 August 2006 and 16 January 2007, comply with the “speed” requirement

) rendu le 15 décembre 2022 par le tribunal judiciaire de Valenciennes APPELANT Monsieur [X] [I] né le 22 mai 1946 à [Localité 8] [Adresse 6] [Localité 7] représenté par Me Vincent Speder