CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0724JUD004146102
24 juillet 2008
The warders, hitting the inmates with rubber truncheons, forced them to leave the cell. In the corridor they continued hitting the applicant with rubber truncheons.
Page 97 sur 241
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0928JUD004617315
28 septembre 2021
xa0; 350 RUB de frais et dépens.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0613JUD003526722
13 juin 2024
39708/22 05/08/2022 Aleksey Yevgenyevich POPOV 1989 Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna St Petersburg Protest against war in Ukraine Tyumen 06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Fine of RUB
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1017JUD003318416
17 octobre 2024
Subsequently, E.B. attempted to hit the prison governor, which prompted the prison guards to use rubber truncheons in order to subdue him.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0926JUD000487715
26 septembre 2017
It further took into account that M. had sold the flat to the applicant for 180,000 Russian roubles (RUB) while she had bought it for RUB 190,000. 11.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-112506
10 juillet 2012
De cette manière, la requérante et des personnes inconnues seraient entrées en possession d’une somme dépassant 590 millions de roubles russes (RUB) appartenant à la « NOMOS-BANK » et en
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0425JUD003185621
25 avril 2024
; 57697/21 07/11/2021 Khochiakbar Numonchonovich SHARIPOV 1998 Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi Rally in support of Izzat Amon Moscow 02/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1214JUD004910811
14 décembre 2021
In particular, it indicated that the applicant had declared income as follows: 21,903 Russian roubles (RUB) for 2004, RUB 18,671 for 2005, RUB 38,762 for 2006 and RUB 177,506 for 2007
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0611DEC007426401
11 juin 2009
Exécution du jugement du 28 septembre 1998 Le 10 mars 1995, le requérant apporta la somme de 600 000 roubles (RUB) dans le capital social d’une société privée « Kompaniya Agroprom-Invest-Géo
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-154285
8 avril 2015
committed by a foreign national or a stateless person who has no document confirming the right to reside or stay in the Russian Federation ... shall be punishable by an administrative fine of between RUB
ECLI:CEDH:001-234250
16 mai 2024
article 19.3 § 1 of CAO and article 20.2 § 5 of CAO administrative detention of 15 days and fine of RUB
16e chambre
627df9920d41e0057d43e806
12 mai 2022
EXPRO, JCP de VERSAILLES N° RG : 20/03655 Expéditions exécutoires Expéditions Copies délivrées le : 12.05.2022 à : Me Rui RESENDE GOMES, avocat au barreau de VERSAILLES Me Marion CORDIER
Cour d'Appel
6253cd4abd3db21cbdd92d71
20 janvier 2016
José Rui Z...
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0619DEC004524020
19 juin 2025
2019 Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma Moscow 27/07/2019 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0312JUD005138007
12 mars 2009
It also awarded the applicant RUB 3,000 for legal costs and expenses. 15.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0115JUD001608604
15 janvier 2015
Of this amount, RUB 1,283,854 (approximately EUR 36,480) represented the combat allowance allegedly due to him from 6 March 2000 to 6 November 2008, RUB 5,400 (EUR
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0531JUD003801005
31 mai 2016
de 3 606 et de 7 585 RUB.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0717JUD006124015
17 juillet 2018
Litvinov for lodging the application to the Court, - RUB 15,000 for the legal assistance provided by Mr Ramadayev, a lawyer.
ECLI:CEDH:001-229259
2 novembre 2023
20.1 § 2 CAO, fine of RUB 2,000; final decision on 22/05/2018 by Moscow City Court, Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0518JUD001734213
18 mai 2021
The applicant claimed 105,960 Russian roubles (RUB) in respect of pecuniary damage and RUB 500,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage. 55.