The preliminary hearing ended on 31 August 2005. 21.

Defence counsel could participate in the hearing. A decision about the defendant’s participation at the hearing was taken by the appeal court.

As to the absence of an oral hearing (a) The parties' submissions 22.

Zamoskvoretskiy District Court (hearing room no. 410).

Oral hearings took place on 7 July and 18 November 1986 before the lower administrative authority.

Lawyer S. was present at those hearings.

A hearing was listed for 5 April 1995.

On 5 February 1996 the District Court held a further hearing on the applicant’s claim.

An oral hearing could be limited to only a part of the appeal.

    The failure of a party, who has been duly notified of the date, time and place of the appeal hearing, to attend the hearing should not preclude the court from proceeding with the examination

The court ordered his detention on remand until the first hearing of his case (case R 94/3064) on 14 June 1994.

In addition, the applicant asked the Supreme Administrative Court to hold an oral hearing in his case. 9.

On 8 May 2000 the date of the next oral hearing was fixed for 13 September 2000.

The court did not hold a hearing prior to this decision.

On 9 April 2001 the court held a hearing.

Several hearings were adjourned. 41.

  As they failed to appear at the hearing on 14   September   1993, the Court adjourned the hearing until 4   October   1993. 19.

SUR LES DEUX MOYENS REUNIS : ATTENDU QUE HEBINGER, ELECTRICIEN AU SERVICE DE LA SOCIETE TIMKEN FRANCE, DELEGUE SYNDICAL ET MEMBRE DU COMITE D'ENTREPRISE, QUI TRAVAILLAIT DE NUIT, AVAIT ETE AFFECTE A PARTIR

However, he was convicted on appeal after the Court of Appeal gave a new interpretation to those witness statements, without hearing them in person.