CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

4 324 résultats pour « Derrendinger »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0427JUD002308305

Admin. suprême

27 avril 2010

27 avril 2010

    However, the right to adversarial proceedings is not absolute and its scope may vary depending on the specific features of the case in question (see Asnar v.

Page 96 sur 217

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1220JUD006557914

Admin. suprême

20 décembre 2016

20 décembre 2016

This is without prejudice to a   possible complaint about the length of the proceedings in respect of this period before the Court depending on the outcome of the Constitutional Court’s examination

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1116JUD001439902

Admin. suprême

16 novembre 2004

16 novembre 2004

In his view the proceedings were not complex, depending solely on oral evidence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0319DEC004025398

Admin. suprême

19 mars 2002

19 mars 2002

The exercise of these powers will have to be reasoned, which implies that, depending on the circumstances, the Enterprise Section will have to judge the functioning of individual members of the management

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1012DEC003367096

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 2000

12 octobre 2000

However, the applicability of one ground does not necessarily preclude that of another; a deprivation of liberty may, depending on the circumstances, be justified under one or more subparagraphs (Witold

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-92192

Admin. suprême

19 mars 2009

19 mars 2009

each of the organisations involved in the HET project;   Welcoming that the HET’s well-structured organisational scheme allows its different teams to concentrate on different aspects of a case depending

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0403DEC002805424

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2025

3 avril 2025

The permissible grounds for deprivation of liberty provided for under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention may overlap; a detention may, depending on the circumstances, be justified under more than one sub-paragraph

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0516DEC003444218

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2023

16 mai 2023

by-elections fall within the general scope of Article   3 of Protocol No. 1, the Court observes, first, that the electorate for any given excepted peer seat may take one of five different forms depending

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0205JUD003293513

Admin. suprême

5 février 2026

5 février 2026

Accordingly, requesting the political party to vacate her property and defending against their counteraction to annul her purchase contract constituted a proper manner for the applicant to raise the relevant

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;FRA;FRE

Grossc/Suisse

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0930JUD006781010

Admin. suprême

30 septembre 2014

30 septembre 2014

    Des observations sur le fond de l’affaire ont par ailleurs été reçues de l’association Alliance Defending Freedom (anciennement connue sous le nom de Alliance Defense Fund), basée aux États-Unis

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0626DEC001196804

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2006

26 juin 2006

The Court need not rule in general whether section   840 of the Administration of Justice Act as claimed by the Government is a remedy, which depending on the circumstances of a case, should be exhausted

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0828DEC003684697

Admin. suprême

28 août 2001

28 août 2001

present case, the Court recalls that the applicant, not being a member of the Church of Sweden, did not have to pay the full church tax but only a portion thereof – 30 or 25 per cent of the full amount depending

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1118DEC004863099

Admin. suprême

18 novembre 2003

18 novembre 2003

According to Chapter 9, section 3, of the 1962 Act (as in force on 1 January 2001) such benefits are granted on a yearly basis at a level of 69, 53 or 36% of the basic amount, depending on the extent to

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0209DEC003967011

Admin. suprême

9 février 2016

9 février 2016

In case her request was refused, she might – depending on the reasons for that refusal – be allowed to await the outcome of an objection in the Netherlands, but if that was not the case she would in any

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0328DEC002863295

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2000

28 mars 2000

    Thus, any prosecutor who receives a complaint alleging a criminal act by a member of the security forces must issue a decision of non-jurisdiction and, depending on the suspect’s status,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1213DEC000353509

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2011

13 décembre 2011

They argued that there was no proof that the counsel had been negligent in defending the applicant. His only wrongdoing was that he had objected to the applicant’s motion for his discharge.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0129JUD006629912

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2019

29 janvier 2019

its conclusion by assessing the evidence in the file, and it had based its decision on the statement of one witness, not on the assumption that only a certain emotional development of the children (depending

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0113JUD004291498

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2005

13 janvier 2005

applicant submitted that the provisions of the Law of 13 March 1973 were discriminatory in that they imposed different conditions for the award of compensation for unwarranted pre-trial detention depending

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1022DEC003557697

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 1998

22 octobre 1998

    Depending on their gravity, charges against air force law could be tried by district, field or general court-martial.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0609DEC001655807

Admin. suprême

9 juin 2015

9 juin 2015

She explained that she had a key to his flat, where she would go once every two   weeks or so, depending on the problems she encountered with her son.

Source officielle