PAR LE PRESENT CODE, EST ASSUJETTIE A LA CONTRIBUTION DES PATENTES" ; CONSIDERANT QU'IL RESULTE DE L'INSTRUCTION QUE LE TOURING CLUB DE FRANCE EXPLOITE A LA CHAPELLE DE VALGAUDEMAS HAUTES-ALPES UN CHALET

justice à sa demande de communication, par courrier électronique, d'une copie de la totalité des décisions ayant ordonné la fouille à nu de son client durant son incarcération à la Maison d'arrêt de Châlons-en-Champagne

The court found that the applicant’s challenge to the Committee’s decision to rank him 174 th on the list was not a valid recourse against an executory administrative act.

Challenge concerning Judge B. 10 .     On 25 January 2017 the applicant challenged the presiding judge in the case, Judge B.

applicable provision of the administrative law (Section 90(1) of the 1998 Act on regional self ‑ government, Ustawa o samorządzie województwa ), the applicants did not have legal interest to challenge

Finally, under Article 86, paternity may be challenged by a prosecutor at any time, as long as the child is alive. 2.

code de procédure civile, - condamné Maître Yves DU CHALARD aux dépens. [***] Maître Yves DU CHALARD a interjeté appel, et, aux termes de ses écritures en date du 8 Février 2005, auxquelles il convient

First, impecuniosity was not a justifiable basis for not having brought a statutory challenge in time.

          S. 73 provides inter alia that a motion of challenge has to be filed with the court, of which the judge challenged is a member, and that the reasons for

complains that there were no relevant and sufficient reasons to remand him in custody, that the courts denied him access to the materials contained in the criminal file which he needed in order to challenge

    The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that his right to a fair trial had been breached since the decisions of the Council could not be challenged before the domestic

On 26 August 2020 the Warsaw Court of Appeal amended the challenged decision and ordered the Regional Court to resume the proceedings. The case of Mr.

    Paternity may be challenged within a time-limit of two years.

The injunction on publishing the article was upheld on appeal in June 2005 (the applicant company did not challenge the injunction concerning the photographs).

In March 2016 the applicant challenged the December   2015 decision refusing temporary asylum before the Federal Migration Authority of the Russian Federation.

when the child reaches the age of majority” Finally, under Article 86 of the Code, as amended with the effect from 13   June 2009, paternity may at any time (as long as the child is alive) be challenged

The applicant points out that he had challenged his dismissal but that the court proceedings regarding this matter were still pending.

On 19 March 2015 the applicant challenged the lawfulness of the decision remanding him in custody.